Logo do repositório

Masking release in cortical auditory evoked potentials with speech stimulus

dc.contributor.authorBorges Rocha, Monyka Ferreira
dc.contributor.authorMenezes, Denise Costa
dc.contributor.authorBandeira Duarte, Danielle Samara
dc.contributor.authorSobral Griz, Silvana Maria
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo Frizzo, Ana Claudia [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMenezes, Pedro de Lemos
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Cleide Fernandes
dc.contributor.authorAdvincula, Karina Paes
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Estadual Ciencias Saude Alagoas UNCISAL
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:16:56Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To analyze the effect of masking on the Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential with speech stimulus in young adults. Methods: Fourteen individuals aged between 19 and 28 years of both sexes with no hearing loss participated in the study. The Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential examination was performed with synthetic speech stimulus /ba/ simultaneous to Speech Shaped Noise presented under three conditions: steady noise with a 30 dB SPLep intensity (weak steady noise), steady noise with a 65 dB SPLep intensity o (strong steady noise) and modulated noise with 30 dB SPLep and 65 dB SPLep intensities at 25Hz and modulation period of 40 ms. Results: Higher latencies were observed in the cortical components, except P2, in the condition of strong steady noise and more meaningful measures of amplitude of the cortical components P1, N1 and P2 in the condition of modulated noise with statistically significant difference in comparison to the strong steady noise condition. There was worse wave morphology in the condition of strong steady noise, when compared to the other records. The average electrophysiological thresholds for the conditions of strong steady noise and modulated noise were 60 dB SPLep and 49 dB SPLep, respectively, showing a 11.7 dB mean difference. Conclusion: We could infer that there was a lower masking effect of modulated noise when compared to the strong steady noise condition, in the amplitude measurements of the cortical components and an average difference of 11.7 dB between the electrophysiological thresholds (interpreted as the measure of the Masking Release).en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Pernambuco UFPE, Programa Posgrad Saude Comunicacao Humana, Rua Prof Arthur Sa S-N,Cidade Univ, BR-50740520 Recife, PE, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Pernambuco UFPE, Programa Posgrad Saude Comunicacao Humana, Dept Fonoaudiol, Recife, PE, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Fed Pernambuco UFPE, Dept Fonoaudiol, Recife, PE, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Programa Posgrad Fonoaudiol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Ciencias Saude Alagoas UNCISAL, Dept Fonoaudiol, Maceio, Alagoas, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho UN, Programa Posgrad Fonoaudiol, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.format.extent7
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20212020334en
dc.identifier.citationCodas. Sao Paulo Sp: Soc Brasileira Fonoaudiologia, v. 35, n. 1, 7 p., 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/2317-1782/20212020334en
dc.identifier.issn2317-1782
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309837
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001086940500002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSoc Brasileira Fonoaudiologia
dc.relation.ispartofCodas
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectElectrophysiology
dc.subjectEvoked Potentials Auditory
dc.subjectSpeech Perception
dc.subjectPerceptual Masking
dc.subjectHearing
dc.titleMasking release in cortical auditory evoked potentials with speech stimulusen
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.rightsHolderSoc Brasileira Fonoaudiologia
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6759-5964[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1314-6100[8]

Arquivos

Coleções