Logo do repositório

How does nano-focus computed tomography impact the quantification of debris within the root canal system?

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Clarissa Teles
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Reinhilde
dc.contributor.authorEzeldeen, Mostafa
dc.contributor.authorde Faria Vasconcelos, Karla
dc.contributor.authorLambrechts, Paul
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Mario Tanomaru [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Jader Camilo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Marco Antonio Hungaro
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionFaculty of Medicine
dc.contributor.institutionKU Leuven
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:13:40Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the quantification of hard-tissue debris by using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and nano-focus computed tomography (nano-CT) after root canal instrumentation. Ten mandibular molars containing an isthmus in the mesial root were scanned in a SkyScan 1172 micro-CT device with a voxel size of 12.8 μm and in a NanoTom nano-CT device with 5.5 μm. The mesial root canals were irrigated with 5 mL of saline solution at the orifice level, instrumented with Reciproc R25 files and a second scanning was performed by micro-CT and nano-CT devices for post-instrumentation images. DataViewer software was used for registering the pre and post-operative micro-CT and nano-CT images. The root canal and the debris were segmented for quantitative analysis of the volume of the canal and volume of debris using CTAn software. Statistical analysis was performed using the T test for comparison between volume of the canal after instrumentation and volume of debris in both image modalities. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Nano-CT images showed higher values of debris when compared with micro-CT (p < 0.05) after root canal instrumentation. No difference was observed between the volume of the root canal after instrumentation in the two imaging methods used (p > 0.05). Nano-CT technology can be recommended as a more precise method for quantitative analysis of hard-tissue debris. Moreover, in Endodontic research it is a promising method, as it is capable of providing higher spatial and contrast resolution, faster scanning and higher image quality.en
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade de São Paulo – USP Bauru School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry Endodontics and Dental Materials, SP
dc.description.affiliationUniversity Hospitals Leuven Faculty of Medicine Department of Imaging and Pathology
dc.description.affiliationUniversity Hospitals Leuven KU Leuven
dc.description.affiliationDentistry Department of Oral Health Sciences Endodontology KU Leuven
dc.description.affiliationUniversidade Estadual Paulista – Unesp School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estadual Paulista – Unesp School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 150046/2018-9
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2023.VOL37.0059
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Oral Research, v. 37.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2023.VOL37.0059
dc.identifier.issn1807-3107
dc.identifier.issn1806-8324
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85163920384
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/308811
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Oral Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnatomic Variation
dc.subjectEndodontics
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparation
dc.subjectX-Ray Microtomography
dc.titleHow does nano-focus computed tomography impact the quantification of debris within the root canal system?en
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9099-4242[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3461-0363[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9992-1138[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0351-3683[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1760-5703 0000-0003-1760-5703[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2574-4706[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2023-1589[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3051-737X[8]

Arquivos

Coleções