Publicação:
Discriminant analysis in the selection of groups of peach cultivars

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível

Data

2018-01-01

Orientador

Coorientador

Pós-graduação

Curso de graduação

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Int Soc Horticultural Science

Tipo

Trabalho apresentado em evento

Direito de acesso

Acesso abertoAcesso Aberto

Resumo

Brazil ranks 14th in the world in terms of peach and nectarine production. Of the nearly 211,000 tons total output, the state of Rio Grande do Sul produces 60% of the national production, while southern Brazil accounts for 75%. This indicates that adequate parameters are required to manage the nutritional status of all fruit trees, of which the peach tree is an important component, as well as the performance of long-term experiments under field conditions in several, but often restricted, numbers of cultivars. The nutritional parameters that have been established as adequate can be applied to other cultivars which reveal similar nutritional contents and equivalent demands. Besides productivity, 12 elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn, Al and Na) were analyzed in leaf tissue samples in 144 commercially cultivated peach orchards in South Rio Grande do Sul, specifically the cultivars of Chimarrita, Chiripa, Delanona, Eragil, Fascinio, Kampai, Pialo, PS10711, PS-Tardia and Sao Barbosa. Group analysis employing the Wilks' Lambda test (F=9.29; p<0.01) revealed differences among the groups. Nutrients like Cu, Zn, K, Mg, Ca and N were found to most significantly influence growth and formed the three main axes for distinguishing among the groups, whereas nutrients like S, P and Mn, showed the least contribution. The nutritional profiles of the peach cultivars can be categorized in homogeneous groups to benefit from the fertilizer trials. Cluster analysis can be instrumental in the diagnosis and nutrient management of peach trees.

Descrição

Idioma

Inglês

Como citar

Viii International Symposium On Mineral Nutrition Of Fruit Crops. Leuven 1: Int Soc Horticultural Science, v. 1217, p. 335-342, 2018.

Itens relacionados

Financiadores

Unidades

Departamentos

Cursos de graduação

Programas de pós-graduação