Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Occurrence, effects and environmental risk of antifouling biocides (EU PT21): Are marine ecosystems threatened?

dc.contributor.authorde Campos, Bruno Galvão [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFigueiredo, Joana
dc.contributor.authorPerina, Fernando [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAbessa, Denis Moledo de Souza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLoureiro, Susana
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Roberto
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Aveiro
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:15:18Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:15:18Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis review presents a comprehensive compilation of toxicological and environmental data, further used to assess the ecological risk (ERA) of the 11 EU approved antifouling biocides (PT21). Diuron, chlorothalonil, DCOIT, and pyrithiones are amongst the most toxic biocides toward producer species, while, CuSCN, medetomidine, and zineb showed higher toxicity toward consumers. In addition, medetomidine, CuSNC, zineb, Cu2O, and chlorothalonil are up to 400-fold more toxic to non-target organisms than target organisms highlighting their potential threat for marine ecosystems. Biocides hazard, which was assessed based on the marine PNECprobabilistic for biocides having enough and reliable ecotoxicological data, can be summarized in the following order: ZnPT (more hazardous) > CuPT > DCOIT > diuron > chlorothalonil > dichlofluanid > tolylfluanid. For the remaining biocides, the marine hazard was calculated based on the PNECdeterministic as follows: CuSCN (more hazardous) > Cu2O > medetomidine > zineb. The risk assessment indicates that the following biocides poses risk (quotient >1) for the coastal ecosystems: DCOIT, diuron, dichlofluanid, chlorothalonil, CuSCN, Cu2O, medetomidine and zineb. In order to protect the services and functions of coastal environments, a systematic and continuous monitoring of these biocides in coastal areas are highly recommended. Current regulatory framework and the replacement of state-of-the-art biocides by safer alternative is also critically discussed.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biology University of Aveiro
dc.description.affiliationCESAM - Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies and Department of Biology University of Aveiro
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1910003
dc.identifier.citationCritical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10643389.2021.1910003
dc.identifier.issn1547-6537
dc.identifier.issn1064-3389
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104995695
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208630
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiofouling
dc.subjecthazard assessment
dc.subjectpredicted no effect concentration (PNEC)
dc.subjectregulation
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjectspecies sensitivity distribution (SSD)
dc.titleOccurrence, effects and environmental risk of antifouling biocides (EU PT21): Are marine ecosystems threatened?en
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1067-0449[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7825-1331[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4609-1668[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5393-9623[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6904-8550[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, São Vicentept
unesp.departmentCiências Biológicas - IBCLPpt

Arquivos