Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparative analysis between a PEM fuel cell and an internal combustion engine driving an electricity generator: Technical, economical and ecological aspects

dc.contributor.authorBraga, Lucia Bollini [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, Jose Luz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Marcio Evaristo da [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMachin, Einara Blanco [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPedroso, Daniel Travieso [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTuna, Celso Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:09:14Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:09:14Z
dc.date.issued2014-02-05
dc.description.abstractIn the recent years the fuel cells have received much attention. Among various technologies, the Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) is currently the most appropriate and is used in several vehicles prototype. A comparative technical, economical and ecological analysis between an Internal Combustion Engine fueled with Diesel driving an electricity Generator (ICE-G) and a PEMFC fed by hydrogen produced by ethanol steam reforming was performed. The technical analysis showed the advantages of the PEMFC in comparison to the ICE-G based in energetic and exergetic aspects. The economic analysis shows that fuel cells are not economic competitive when compared to internal combustion engine driving an electricity generator with the same generation capacity; it will only be economically feasible in a long term; due to the large investments required. The environmental analysis was based on concepts of CO2 equivalent, pollution indicator and ecological efficiency. Different to the ICE-G system, the Fuel Cell does not emit pollutants directly and the emission related to this technology is linked mainly with hydrogen production. The ecological efficiency of PEMFC was 96% considering the carbon dioxide cycle, for ICE-G system this parameter reach 51%. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, BR-12516410 Guaratingueta, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.format.extent354-361
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.10.053
dc.identifier.citationApplied Thermal Engineering. Oxford: Pergamon-elsevier Science Ltd, v. 63, n. 1, p. 354-361, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2013.10.053
dc.identifier.issn1359-4311
dc.identifier.lattes1750154267305530
dc.identifier.lattes9535897335897207
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112101
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000331021600036
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Thermal Engineering
dc.relation.ispartofjcr3.771
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,505
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen
dc.subjectEcological analysisen
dc.subjectTechnical analysisen
dc.subjectInternal combustion engineen
dc.subjectProton exchange membrane fuel cellen
dc.titleComparative analysis between a PEM fuel cell and an internal combustion engine driving an electricity generator: Technical, economical and ecological aspectsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes1750154267305530
unesp.author.lattes9535897335897207
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8885-5614[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2020-7063[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5270-9041[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Engenharia, Guaratinguetápt
unesp.departmentEnergia - FEGpt

Arquivos