Avaliação da adaptação marginal de copings cerâmicos obtidos por diferentes métodos de moldagem
Carregando...
Arquivos
Data
2018-08-13
Autores
Pinto, Tatiana Saretta Ferreira [UNESP]
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Resumo
O objetivo desse estudo foi avaliar a adaptação marginal de copings cerâmicos obtidos pelos métodos de moldagem convencional e escaneamento. Os modelos foram separados em 3 grupos para avaliação e todas as coroas foram confeccionadas sobre um modelo mestre previamente fabricado em CoCr. Grupo 1: Com o auxílio de uma moldeira individual cilíndrica de acrílico foram reproduzidas 10 moldagens com silicona de adição (Panasil) no modelo mestre pela técnica de moldagem dupla e replicados dez modelos físicos em gesso pedra Fuji Rock.Sobre esses modelos foi realizado o enceramento dos copings, confecção dos sprues de cera e sobre eles foi realizada a injeção da cerâmica Grupo 2: foram realizadas 10 moldagens diretas com scanner extraoral (Swing Dental Scanner) no modelo mestre. As imagens foram obtidas através do software Exocad e copings em IPS-Emax CAD foram confeccionados em fresadora (Ceramill Motion 2) para posterior sinterização da cerâmica. Grupo 3: foram realizadas 10 moldagens diretas com scanner intraoral (CEREC Bluecam) no modelo mestre. As imagens foram obtidas através do software Exocad. Copings em IPS-Emax CAD foram confeccionados em fresadora (Ceramill Motion 2) para posterior sinterização da cerâmica. Os copings de cerâmica não foram cimentados no modelo mestre, apenas posicionados e mantidos com pressão constante de 1,4 a 1,5 kg durante a medição, com a ajuda de um delineador adaptado para esse trabalho, onde oito pontos eletivos foram usados como referência para medir a distância vertical entre a linha de término do modelo mestre e a linha de término dos copings. A margem em cada ponto foi medida 3 vezes com estéreomicroscópio Discovery V20 (ZEISS). A média de desadaptação marginal foi calculada e submetida ao teste de variância de um fator ANOVA com nível de significância de 5% e foram obtidos os seguintes resultados: 66,15µm para o grupo 1; 67,48µm para o grupo 2 e 72,91µm para o grupo 3,verificando assim que esses valores não diferem estatisticamente e todos estão dentro do limite de aceitabilidade clínica
The objective of the study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns obtained by conventional molding and scanning methods. The models were separated into 3 groups for evaluation and all the crowns were made on a master model previously manufactured in CoCr. For group 1: With the aid of a single cylindrical acrylic tray the master model was molded 10 times with Panasil in the master model by the technique of double molding and replicated ten physical models in stone gypsum Fuji Rock. On these models was done the waxing of the copings, making the sprues of wax and on them was carried out the injection of the ceramics In group 2, 10 direct impressions were performed with the Swing Dental Scanner (Korea) extra oral scanner in the master model. The images were obtained through the software Exocad (GmbH) and copings in IPS-Emax CAD were made in the Ceramill Motion 2 (Amanngirrbach) mill for subsequent sintering of the ceramics. In group 3, 10 direct impressions were performed with the CEREC Bluecam intraoral scanner (Sirona Dental Systems) in the master model. The images were obtained through the Exocad (GmbH) software. IPS-Emax CAD copings were made in the Ceramill Motion 2 (Amanngirrbach) mill for subsequent sintering of the ceramic. Ceramic copings were not cemented in the master model, only positioned and maintained with a constant pressure of 1.4 to 1.5 kg during the measurement, with the aid of an eyeliner adapted for this work, where eight elective points were used as reference to measure the vertical distance between the end line of the master model and the end line of the copings. The margin at each point was measured 3 times with stereo microscope Discovery V20 (ZEISS). The mean was calculated and submitted to the ANOVA variance test "with a significance level of 5% and the following results were obtained: 66.15μm for group 1; 67.48μm for group 2 and 72.91μm for group 3, thus verifying that these values do not differ statistically and all are within the limit of clinical acceptability.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns obtained by conventional molding and scanning methods. The models were separated into 3 groups for evaluation and all the crowns were made on a master model previously manufactured in CoCr. For group 1: With the aid of a single cylindrical acrylic tray the master model was molded 10 times with Panasil in the master model by the technique of double molding and replicated ten physical models in stone gypsum Fuji Rock. On these models was done the waxing of the copings, making the sprues of wax and on them was carried out the injection of the ceramics In group 2, 10 direct impressions were performed with the Swing Dental Scanner (Korea) extra oral scanner in the master model. The images were obtained through the software Exocad (GmbH) and copings in IPS-Emax CAD were made in the Ceramill Motion 2 (Amanngirrbach) mill for subsequent sintering of the ceramics. In group 3, 10 direct impressions were performed with the CEREC Bluecam intraoral scanner (Sirona Dental Systems) in the master model. The images were obtained through the Exocad (GmbH) software. IPS-Emax CAD copings were made in the Ceramill Motion 2 (Amanngirrbach) mill for subsequent sintering of the ceramic. Ceramic copings were not cemented in the master model, only positioned and maintained with a constant pressure of 1.4 to 1.5 kg during the measurement, with the aid of an eyeliner adapted for this work, where eight elective points were used as reference to measure the vertical distance between the end line of the master model and the end line of the copings. The margin at each point was measured 3 times with stereo microscope Discovery V20 (ZEISS). The mean was calculated and submitted to the ANOVA variance test "with a significance level of 5% and the following results were obtained: 66.15μm for group 1; 67.48μm for group 2 and 72.91μm for group 3, thus verifying that these values do not differ statistically and all are within the limit of clinical acceptability.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Prótese dentária, Técnicas de impressão, Prótese parcial fixa, Dental prosthesis, Printing techniques, Fixed partial denture