Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFaleiros, Gabriel Diniz
dc.contributor.authorSantos, David Ferreira Lopes [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorConceição, Elimar Veloso [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCorá, José Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T11:09:58Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T11:09:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-01
dc.identifier.citationCustos e Agronegocio, v. 16, n. Special Issue, p. 28-56, 2020.
dc.identifier.issn1808-2882
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/208305
dc.description.abstractBrazil is one of the largest food suppliers in the world. The country faces new challenges to remain competitive considering the dynamism of Brazil´s agribusiness sector, with the need to balance agricultural production with environmental preservation. New technologies that result in sustainable production systems that provide yield gains are necessary. This study aims to economically analyse a conservationist system conducted during 10 consecutive years. The treatments were the combination of summer and winter crops under no-tillage system. The summer crop sequences (sown in October/November) were (i) continuous maize cultivation, (ii) continuous soybean, and (iii) soybean/maize rotation. The winter crops (sown in February/March) were (i) maize, (ii) sunflower, (iii) oilseed radish, (iv) pearl millet, (v) pigeon pea, (vi) grain sorghum, and (vii) sunn hemp, consisting of 21 treatments. An investment analysis was performed based on a discounted cash flow. The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) was used to define the discount rate. The data were extrapolated to a typical property of 50 hectares. The results indicate that the yield gain is significant in the conservationist system adopted and superior to that reported in the national average. The minimum attractiveness rate was high for all the treatments. The adoption of soybean and maize rotation, with maize as off-season provided the best economic alternative. The second best alternative is the soybean monoculture with maize as off-season, widely adopted in Brazil for its great agronomic benefit. In conclusion, the investment costs are high, making the small-scale production of soybean and maize not sustainable in the long term. Furthermore, an idleness of the defined machinery and labour capacity was observed. However, the production of maize or sunflower in the off-season resulted in a positive operational cash flow in all treatments.en
dc.format.extent28-56
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCustos e Agronegocio
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAlternative crops
dc.subjectConservation agriculture
dc.subjectFarm management
dc.subjectSoybean. Maize
dc.titleEconomic analysis of soybean-maize crop rotation in a no-tillage systemen
dc.typeArtigo
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationMarket Analyst at Center for Advanced Studies on Applied Economics (Cepea) University of Sao Paulo, Av. Pádua Dias, 11 - CEP 13418-900
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State University (Unesp), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n - CEP 14884-900
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State University (Unesp), Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n - CEP 14884-900
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85099138637
Localize o texto completo

Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record