Uso de indicadores para estimar fluxos de matéria seca ileal em eqüinos fistulados
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Data
1998-11-01
Autores
De Almeida Oliveira, Ana Alix Mendes [UNESP]
De Campos Valadares Filho, Sebastião
De Queiroz, Augusto César
Leão, Maria Ignez
Cecon, Paulo Roberto
Pereira, José Carlos
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Resumo
This experiment was carried out with six half-bred Bretão-Campolina colts with ileum fistulated to evaluate the difference in the ileum dry matter flow estimated by chromic oxide, cellulose, NDF, lignin and fecal lignin through the collection of ileum samples digesta at 28 h intervals, totalizing six samples per animal, starting at 10:00 a.m. The animals were fed ad libitum with the following diets: R1: elephantgrass, R2: elephantgrass plus ground corn, and R3: elephantgrass plus ground corn plus soybean meal. The data was statistically described, based on the coefficient of variation. The values of dry matter prececal digestion coefficients were, respectively, for diets 1, 2 and 3, at six schedules, for cellulose (-16.4; 21.4 and 6.6%), NDF (-34.7; 28.8 and -12.8%), to lignin (-51.5; -5.1 and -25.7%), in two schedules for cellulose (-13.4; 25.6 and 21.5%), fecal lignin (-37.1; 16.6 and -6.4%) and chromic oxide (-219.3; 36.4 and 9.5%). The coefficients of variation were, respectively, for the diets 1, 2 and 3, at six schedules, for cellulose (148.3; 107.5 and 522.7%), NDF (95.4; 80.9 and 314.3%), lignin (210.2; 752.3 and 209.6%), at two schedules for cellulose (148.5; 80.7 and 70.0%), fecal lignin, (262.4; 177.9 and 723.5%) and chromic oxide (141.1; 158.9 and 473.4%). In diet 1, the ileum dry matter flow were over estimated for all markers, showing that chosen collection time to estimate the flows were not adequate. Based on the coefficient of variation of the diets 2 and 3, the cellulose at two schedules was the most marker indicator to determine the ileum dry matter flow.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Equine, Fistula, Flow and dry matter, Ileum, Markers
Como citar
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 27, n. 6, p. 1177-1181, 1998.