The effects of landscape patterns on ecosystem services: meta-analyses of landscape services

dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Gabriela Teixeira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Paloma Marques [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCornelissen, Tatiana Garabini
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Milton Cezar [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPaglia, Adriano Pereira
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São João Del-Rei
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:37:32Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:37:32Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The recently introduced concept of ‘landscape services’—ecosystem services influenced by landscape patterns—may be particularly useful in landscape planning by potentially increasing stakeholder participation and financial funding. However, integrating this concept remains challenging. In order to bypass this barrier, we must gain a greater understanding of how landscape composition and configuration influence the services provided. Methods: We conducted meta-analyses that considered published studies evaluating the effects of several landscape metrics on the following services: pollination, pest control, water quality, disease control, and aesthetic value. We report the cumulative mean effect size (E++), where the signal of the values is related to positive or negative influences. Results: Landscape complexity differentially influenced the provision of services. Particularly, the percentage of natural areas had an effect on natural enemies (E++ = 0.35), pollination (E++ = 0.41), and disease control (E++ = 0.20), while the percentage of no-crop areas had an effect on water quality (E++ = 0.42) and pest response (E++ = 0.33). Furthermore, heterogeneity had an effect on aesthetic value (E++ = 0.5) and water quality (E++ = − 0.40). Moreover, landscape aggregation was important to explaining pollination (E++ = 0.29) and water quality (E++ = 0.35). Conclusions: The meta-analyses reinforce the importance of considering landscape structure in assessing ecosystem services for management purposes and decision-making. The magnitude of landscape effect varies according to the service being studied. Therefore, land managers must account for landscape composition and configuration in order to ensure the maintenance of services and adapt their approach to suit the focal service.en
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia e Conservação (LEC) Departamento de Biologia Geral Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia Espacial e Conservação (LEEC) Departamento de Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Av. 24A, 1515
dc.description.affiliationLaboratório de Ecologia Vegetal e Interações (LEVIN) Departamento de Ciências Naturais Universidade Federal de São João Del-Rei, Praça Dom Helvécio, 74 Fábricas
dc.description.affiliationUnespLaboratório de Ecologia Espacial e Conservação (LEEC) Departamento de Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Av. 24A, 1515
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 141571/2017-9
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 147835/2016-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2013/50421-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 307210-2016-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 312292/2016-3
dc.format.extent1247-1257
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0673-5
dc.identifier.citationLandscape Ecology, v. 33, n. 8, p. 1247-1257, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-018-0673-5
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85048998088.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1572-9761
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.lattes4158685235743119
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85048998088
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/179979
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofLandscape Ecology
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,858
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,858
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectComplexity
dc.subjectEcological benefits
dc.subjectLandscape metrics
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectSpatial patterns
dc.subjectStructure
dc.titleThe effects of landscape patterns on ecosystem services: meta-analyses of landscape servicesen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.lattes4158685235743119
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8640-2347[1]

Arquivos

Pacote Original
Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85048998088.pdf
Tamanho:
802.4 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: