Evaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedure

dc.contributor.authorSantos, Pamela Leticia dos
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, Thallita Pereira
dc.contributor.authorMargonar, Rogerio
dc.contributor.authorGomes de Souza Carvalho, Abrahao Cavalcante [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBetoni, Walter
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues Rezende, Regis Rocha
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Paulo Henrique dos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Idelmo Rangel [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Ctr Araraquara UNIARA
dc.contributor.institutionCentro Univ Araraquara
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Cuiaba UNIC
dc.contributor.institutionDent Sch Cuiaba
dc.contributor.institutionUniFEB
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:10:42Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:10:42Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated and compared bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after several implant osteotomies in the guided surgery technique and the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: The tibias of 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG); subgroups were then designated (G0, G1, G2, G3, and G4, corresponding to drills used 0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 times, respectively). Each animal received 10 sequential osteotomies (5 in each tibia) with each technique. Thermal changes were quantified, drill roughness was measured, and the drills were subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Results: Bone temperature generated by drilling was significantly higher in the GG than in the CG. Drill deformation in the GG and CG increased with drill use, and in the CG a significant difference between GO and groups G3 and G4 was observed. In the GG, a significant difference between GO and all other groups was found. For GG versus CG, a significant difference was found in the 40th osteotomy. Drill roughness in both groups was progressive in accordance with increased use, but there was no statistically significant difference between subgroups or between GG and CG overall. Conclusion: During preparation of implant osteotomies, the guided surgery technique generated a higher bone temperature and deformed drills more than the classic drilling procedure. The increase in tissue temperature was directly proportional to the number of times drills were used, but neither technique generated critical necrosis-inducing temperatures. Drill deformation was directly proportional to the number of times the drills were used. The roughness of the drills was directly proportional to the number of reuses in both groups but tended to be higher in the GG group.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sagrado Coracao, Dept Oral Biol, Discipline Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Integrated, Bauru, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Ctr Araraquara UNIARA, Discipline Oral & Maxillofacial Surg & Integrated, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCentro Univ Araraquara, Postgrad Course Dent lmplantol, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCentro Univ Araraquara, Univ Ctr Araraquara, Discipline Periodontol & Integrated Clin, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCentro Univ Araraquara, Postgrad Course Dent Implantol, Araraquara, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dent Sch Aracatuba, Dept Surg & Integrated Clin, Discipline Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Cuiaba UNIC, Dept Oral Surg, Cuiaba, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationDent Sch Cuiaba, Mato Grosso, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniFEB, Univ Ctr Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Discipline Dent Mat, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, Dent Sch Aragatuba, Dept Surg, Discipline Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Dent Sch Aracatuba, Dept Surg & Integrated Clin, Discipline Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Discipline Dent Mat, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, Dent Sch Aragatuba, Dept Surg, Discipline Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Aracatuba, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent51-58
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2919
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 29, n. 1, p. 51-58, 2014.
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.lattes0493479801083622
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4100-5153
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/112434
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000330750200004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.699
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,576
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbone overheatingen
dc.subjectdental implantsen
dc.subjectosteotomyen
dc.titleEvaluation of Bone Heating, Drill Deformation, and Drill Roughness After Implant Osteotomy: Guided Surgery and Classic Drilling Procedureen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
unesp.author.lattes0493479801083622[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4100-5153[7]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt

Arquivos