Biofilms of Candida albicans serotypes A and B differ in their sensitivity to photodynamic therapy

dc.contributor.authorRossoni, Rodnei Dennis [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa, Junia Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Felipe Eduardo de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Luciane Dias de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCardoso Jorge, Antonio Olavo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJunqueira, Juliana Campos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T15:53:00Z
dc.date.available2015-03-18T15:53:00Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-01
dc.description.abstractCandida albicans is classified into different serotypes according to cell wall mannan composition and cell surface hydrophobicity. Since the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) depends on the cell wall structure of microorganisms, the objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity of in vitro biofilms of C. albicans serotypes A and B to antimicrobial PDT. Reference strains of C. albicans serotype A (ATCC 36801) and serotype B (ATCC 36802) were used for the assays. A gallium-aluminum-arsenide laser (660 nm) was used as the light source and methylene blue (300 mu M) as the photosensitizer. After biofilm formation on the bottom of a 96-well microplate for 48 h, each Candida strain was submitted to assays: PDT consisting of laser and photosensitizer application (L + P+), laser application alone (L + P-), photosensitizer application alone (L-P+), and application of saline as control (L-P-). After treatment, biofilm cells were scraped off and transferred to tubes containing PBS. The content of the tubes was homogenized, diluted, and seeded onto Sabouraud agar plates to determine the number of colony-forming units (CFU/mL). The results were compared by analysis of variance and Tukey test (p < 0.05). The two strains studied were sensitive to PDT (L + P+), with a log reduction of 0.49 for serotype A and of 2.34 for serotype B. Laser application alone only reduced serotype B cells (0.53 log), and the use of the photosensitizer alone had no effect on the strains tested. It can be concluded that in vitro biofilms of C. albicans serotype B were more sensitive to PDT.en
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Biosci & Oral Diag, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Biosci & Oral Diag, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
dc.format.extent1679-1684
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1570-z
dc.identifier.citationLasers In Medical Science. London: Springer London Ltd, v. 29, n. 5, p. 1679-1684, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-014-1570-z
dc.identifier.issn0268-8921
dc.identifier.lattes1664688357804299
dc.identifier.lattes4716676611330311
dc.identifier.lattes0053567153623569
dc.identifier.lattes0322020541055900
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/116288
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000341503500021
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofLasers In Medical Science
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.949
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,713
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCandida albicansen
dc.subjectPhotodynamic therapyen
dc.subjectMethylene blueen
dc.subjectSerotypesen
dc.titleBiofilms of Candida albicans serotypes A and B differ in their sensitivity to photodynamic therapyen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights?SGWID=0-176704-12-683201-0
dcterms.rightsHolderSpringer
unesp.author.lattes1664688357804299
unesp.author.lattes4716676611330311
unesp.author.lattes0053567153623569[5]
unesp.author.lattes0322020541055900
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1747-6158[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos