Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2024 a 5 de janeiro de 2025.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

 

Biomass gasification for combined heat and power generation in the Cuban context: Energetic and economic analysis

dc.contributor.authorPérez, Nestor Proenza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMachin, Einara Blanco [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPedroso, Daniel Travieso [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Justo Jose [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, Julio Santana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilveira, Jose Luz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T07:26:20Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T07:26:20Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-17
dc.description.abstractIn the present work is performed a technical and economic analysis of a combined heat and power generation system (CHP), designed to operate coupled to an internal combustion engine (ICE) fueled with biomass producer gas, in order to generate electricity and hot water for isolated communities of power distribution network. In the proposed system configuration, the energy of the engine's hot exhaust gases is recovered (cogeneration), making this system more attractive in relation to conventional configurations, which are normally used to produce solely mechanical and electrical energy. The proposed system is composed of a modified downdraft gasifier, Imbert technology; coupled to an internal combustion engine, model ZIL-131. The system is designed and built in the laboratory of fluid mechanics at the University of Camagüey. The feedstock studied for the gasifier was Dichrostachys Cinerea, collected in neighboring areas to the proposed place of installation. The main energy flows and the costs associated with the production of producer gas were determinate. From the mass and energy balances, the thermal and electric efficiencies of the cogeneration systems resulted in ηhw = 32.4% and ηge = 23.4% respectively, whereas the overall efficiency led to ηglobal = 33.3%. In the economic analysis were studied the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), the Net Present Value (NPV) and time of return on investment (TRI) or payback, considering a project lifespan of 15 years. For the annual interest rate of 12%, the electricity should be sold at 1.3 USD/kWh in order to the project be feasible. The IRR resulted in 12%, the NPV was 21,571 USD and payback period resulted in 5.3 years. In the proposed configuration, the system consumes 1.46 kg of biomass per kWe produced, with a maximum cost of generated electricity of 1.122 USD/kWh.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University Faculty of Engineering at Guaratinguetá Department of Energy Laboratory of Optimization Energetic Systems (LOSE)
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University Faculty of Engineering at Guaratinguetá Department of Energy Laboratory of Optimization Energetic Systems (LOSE)
dc.format.extent1-12
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.0951359-4311
dc.identifier.citationApplied Thermal Engineering, v. 90, p. 1-12.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.0951359-4311
dc.identifier.issn1359-4311
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84937030486
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/228013
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Thermal Engineering
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomass
dc.subjectCogeneration
dc.subjectDowndraft gasifier
dc.subjectGasification
dc.subjectInternal combustion engine
dc.titleBiomass gasification for combined heat and power generation in the Cuban context: Energetic and economic analysisen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.departmentEnergia - FEGpt

Arquivos