Atenção!


O atendimento às questões referentes ao Repositório Institucional será interrompido entre os dias 20 de dezembro de 2024 a 5 de janeiro de 2025.

Pedimos a sua compreensão e aproveitamos para desejar boas festas!

 

A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions - Part II: Three-Phase Four-Wire Systems

dc.contributor.authorParedes, Helmo K. M.
dc.contributor.authorMarafao, Fernando P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Luiz C. P. da
dc.contributor.authorToma, L.
dc.contributor.authorOtomega, B.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T22:02:03Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10T22:02:03Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the major similarities and discrepancies among three important current decompositions proposed for the interpretation of unbalanced and/or non linear three-phase four-wire power circuits. The considered approaches were the so-called FBD Theory, the pq-Theory and the CPT. Although the methods are based on different concepts, the results obtained under ideal conditions (sinusoidal and balanced signals) are very similar. The main differences appear in the presence of unbalanced and non linear load conditions. It will be demonstrated and discussed how the choice of the voltage referential and the return conductor impedance can influence in the resulting current components, as well as, the way of interpreting a power circuit with return conductor. Under linear unbalanced conditions, both FBI) and pq-Theory suggest that the some current components contain a third-order harmonic. Besides, neither pq-Theory nor FBI) method are able to provide accurate information for reactive current under unbalanced and distorted conditions, what can he done by means of the CPT.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Automat & Integrating Syst, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Automat & Integrating Syst, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para o Desenvolvimento da UNESP (FUNDUNESP)
dc.format.extent917-+
dc.identifier.citation2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5. New York: Ieee, p. 917-+, 2009.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/197395
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000276834600140
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIeee
dc.relation.ispartof2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectFBD-theory
dc.subjectpq-theory
dc.subjectHomo-variables
dc.subjectharmonics
dc.subjectcurrent decomposition
dc.subjectpower theory
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions - Part II: Three-Phase Four-Wire Systemsen
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento
dcterms.licensehttp://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/rights_policies.html
dcterms.rightsHolderIeee
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Sorocabapt
unesp.departmentEngenharia de Controle e Automação - ICTSpt

Arquivos