One-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorations

dc.contributor.authorPerdigão, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorDutra-Corrêa, Maristela [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCastilhos, Natália [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCarmo, André R. P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAnauate-Netto, Camillo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCordeiro, Hiram J. D.
dc.contributor.authorAmore, Ricardo
dc.contributor.authorLewgoy, Hugo R.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Minnesota
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Mogi das Cruzes
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Bandeirante de São Paulo
dc.contributor.institutionBrazilian Army Dental Corps.
dc.contributor.institutionUNIBAN
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T18:55:33Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T18:55:33Z
dc.date.issued2007-04-01
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the 1-year clinical performance of three self-etching adhesives (Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, iBond) in posterior composite restorations using one etch&rinse adhesive (One-Step Plus) as control. Methods: Upon approval by the Institutional Review Board, 121 restorations were inserted in 38 subjects. The adhesives were applied as per manufacturers' instructions. Preparations were restored with a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme) and evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Statistical analyses included the Chi-square distribution with the McNemar non-parametric test (P< 0.05). Results: At 1 year, 111 restorations in 35 subjects were evaluated using the USPHS modified criteria. No significant changes were observed for the etch&rinse adhesive One-Step Plus. At 1 year the number of Alfa ratings decreased significantly for Clearfil S3 Bond and for iBond in the categories color match, marginal staining, and marginal adaptation. For Adper Prompt L-Pop, marginal adaptation at 1 year was significantly worse than at baseline. Postoperative sensitivity to air improved significantly for Adper Prompt L-Pop, Clearfil S3 Bond, and iBond. When the evaluation criteria were paired at 1 year, iBond resulted in a significantly lower number of Alfa ratings than any of the other adhesives for color match, marginal Staining, and marginal adaptation. One-Step Plus resulted in a greater number of Alfa ratings for marginal adaptation than either Adper Prompt L-Pop or Clearfil S3 Bond. Marginal adaptation was significantly better for Clearfil S3 Bond than for Adper Prompt L-Pop. The post-operative sensitivity measured at 1 year for Adper Prompt L-Pop was statistically better than that for One-Step Plus.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Sciences 8-450 Moos Tower University of Minnesota, 515 SE Delaware St., Minneapolis, MN 55455
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Operative Dentistry Department of Restorative Sciences University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry University of Mogi das Cruzes, Mogi das Cruzes, SP
dc.description.affiliationUNESP, São José dos Campos, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry University Bandeirante de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP
dc.description.affiliationBrazilian Army Dental Corps.
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry UNIBAN
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Operative Dentistry University of Mogi das Cruzes
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biomaterials UNIBAN
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP, São José dos Campos, SP
dc.format.extent125-133
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Dentistry, v. 20, n. 2, p. 125-133, 2007.
dc.identifier.issn0894-8275
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-34249687066
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/219416
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleOne-year clinical performance of self-etch adhesives in posterior restorationsen
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos

Coleções