Are nanomaterials leading to more efficient agriculture? Outputs from 2009 to 2022 research metadata analysis

dc.contributor.authorSantos, E.
dc.contributor.authorMontanha, G. S.
dc.contributor.authorGomes, M. H. F.
dc.contributor.authorDuran, N. M.
dc.contributor.authorCorrea, C. G.
dc.contributor.authorRomeu, S. L. Z.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, A. E. S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, J. L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, E.
dc.contributor.authorPerez-de-Luque, A.
dc.contributor.authorGhoshal, S.
dc.contributor.authorSantaella, C.
dc.contributor.authorLima, R. de
dc.contributor.authorFraceto, L. F.
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, H. W. P.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionSapienza Univ Rome
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionIFAPA Alameda Obispo
dc.contributor.institutionMcGill Univ
dc.contributor.institutionAix Marseille Univ
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Sorocaba UNISO
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T13:41:48Z
dc.date.available2022-11-30T13:41:48Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-19
dc.description.abstractAgriculture is responsible for supplying food, feed, fibres, and an increasing fraction of fuel and raw chemicals for industry. Fulfilling such demands sustainably is one of the major challenges of our time. In this metadata analysis, we offer a quantitative overview of how scientists have been addressing the effects of nanomaterials on plants between 2009 and 2022. The analysis showed that cultivated crops (ca. 55%) and plant nutrients (54%) are mostly employed in the studies, pointing to the relevance of these aspects to agriculture. Nevertheless, it also revealed that the concentration of elements as nanomaterials is generally more than 2-fold higher than the elemental concentration applied as traditionally formulated fertilisers or those naturally found in soil. Furthermore, the median time span of most studies, i.e., 49 days for plants cultivated in soil, is still quite short compared to annual crop life cycles (90-120 days), and little attention (19% of treatments) has been devoted to soil microorganisms. Also, only a small fraction of experiments (6%) has been carried out under field conditions. Therefore, the data did not allow establishing correlations between effects and experimental parameters, such as concentration range, soil pH, or time of exposure. These observations point to the intricate relationship between our ability to infer conclusions and the experimental design employed. Finally, this comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the effects of nanomaterials on plant systems raises the question of whether nanomaterials will lead to incremental yield gains by replacing current inputs with nanotechnology-based ones, such as the controlled release of fertilizers and pesticides, or will disrupt agriculture by attacking problems so far not practically addressed, such as hacking plant stress and defence mechanisms or modulating metabolism and photosystems.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sao Paulo, Ctr Nucl Energy Agr CENA, Lab Nucl Instrumentat, USP, BR-13416000 Piracicaha, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSapienza Univ Rome, Biol & Biotechnol Dept Charles Darwin DBBCD, I-00185 Rome, Italy
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, BR-18087180 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationIFAPA Alameda Obispo, Area Genom & Biotechnol, Ave Menendez Pick S-N, Cordoba 14004, Spain
dc.description.affiliationMcGill Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Montreal, PQ H3A 0C3, Canada
dc.description.affiliationAix Marseille Univ, BIAM, Lab Microbial Ecol Rhizosphere, CEA,CNRS, F-13108 Saint Paul Lez Durance, France
dc.description.affiliationUniv Sorocaba UNISO, Bioact Assessment & Toxicol Nanomat Lab LABITON, BR-18023000 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Sci & Technol, BR-18087180 Sorocaba, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipAgrichem do Brasil S.A. (FEALQ)
dc.description.sponsorshipVittia Fertilizantes e Biologicos S.A.
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2020/07721-9
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2020/11178-9
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2020/11546-8
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2017/16375-4
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2015-05942-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2016/50014-6
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2017/21004-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 407380/2016-7
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 306185/2020-2
dc.description.sponsorshipIdAgrichem do Brasil S.A. (FEALQ): 10245-8
dc.description.sponsorshipIdVittia Fertilizantes e Biologicos S.A.: FEALQ 10359-8
dc.format.extent14
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1en01078f
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science-nano. Cambridge: Royal Soc Chemistry, 14 p., 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1039/d1en01078f
dc.identifier.issn2051-8153
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/237683
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000850171500001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherRoyal Soc Chemistry
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science-nano
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleAre nanomaterials leading to more efficient agriculture? Outputs from 2009 to 2022 research metadata analysisen
dc.typeResenha
dcterms.rightsHolderRoyal Soc Chemistry

Arquivos

Coleções