Comparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: A pilot study

dc.contributor.authorLima Jr., José Lacet
dc.contributor.authorDias-Ribeiro, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorFerreira-Rocha, Julierme [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Ramon
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Fábio Wildson Gurgel
dc.contributor.authorFan, Song
dc.contributor.authorSant'Ana, Eduardo
dc.contributor.institutionDental Association of Paraíba
dc.contributor.institutionState Emergency and Trauma Hospital
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Capina Grande (UFCG)
dc.contributor.institutionEmergency and Trauma Hospital
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Ceará
dc.contributor.institutionResidency Program Dental Association of Paraíba
dc.contributor.institutionSun Yat-Sen University
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T07:11:55Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T07:11:55Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-01
dc.description.abstractWe compared the buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 or 1 : 200,000 epinephrine without a palatal injection for the extraction of impacted maxillary third molars with chronic pericoronitis. This prospective, double-blind, controlled clinical trial involved 30 patients between the ages of 15 and 46 years who desired extraction of a partially impacted upper third molar with pericoronitis. Group 1 (15 patients) received 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine and group 2 (15 patients) received 4% articaine with 1 : 200,000 epinephrine by buccal infiltration. None of the patients in group 1 reported pain, but 3 patients in group 2 reported pain, which indicated a need for a supplementary palatal injection. The palatal injections were all successful in eliminating the pain. Two additional patients in group 2 experienced pain when the suture needle penetrated their palatal mucosa. Based on these results, 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine was found to be more effective for the removal of upper third molars in the presence of pericoronitis than 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1 : 200,000 epinephrine when only a buccal infiltration was used. © 2013 by the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology.en
dc.description.affiliationResidency Program of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Dental Association of Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery State Emergency and Trauma Hospital, João Pessoa, PB
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Stomatology Bauru Dental School University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP
dc.description.affiliationOral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of State São Paulo Julio Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Araçatuba
dc.description.affiliationOral and Maxillofacial Department Federal University of Capina Grande (UFCG)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Emergency and Trauma Hospital, João Pessoa, PB
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Stomatology Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE
dc.description.affiliationResidency Program Dental Association of Paraíba, João Pessoa
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Stomatology Second Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou
dc.description.affiliationUnespOral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of State São Paulo Julio Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Araçatuba
dc.format.extent42-45
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.42
dc.identifier.citationAnesthesia Progress, v. 60, n. 2, p. 42-45, 2013.
dc.identifier.doi10.2344/0003-3006-60.2.42
dc.identifier.issn0003-3006
dc.identifier.issn1878-7177
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84883034228
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/227199
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnesthesia Progress
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectArticaine
dc.subjectEpinephrine
dc.subjectMolar extraction
dc.titleComparison of buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with 1 : 100,000 and 1 : 200,000 epinephrine for extraction of maxillary third molars with pericoronitis: A pilot studyen
dc.typeArtigo

Arquivos