Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorGartti-Jardim, Ellen Cristina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSouza, Ariane Paredes de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Abrahão Cavalcante Gomes de Souza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Cassiano Costa Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Roberta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFilho, Osvaldo Magro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:27:26Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:27:26Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-27
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Various types of sutures are available in the market with different constitutions. However, there is a lack of research to assess and quantify the behavior of these materials. Resources and materials: This study comes benchmark wires polyglactin 910 (Vicryl ®), irradiated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapid ®), polyglactin 910 treated with triclosan (Vicryl Plus ®), and poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl ®). For this, we used 40 rats that were divided into two groups, underwent two skin incisions longitudinal 2-cm long. In Group A, simple interrupted sutures using irradiated polyglactin 910 on the right and left side of polyglactin 910, and in group B, polyglactin 910 with triclosan on the right and the left poliglecaprone 25 were made. At 2, 7, 14, and 28 days after surgery, the ten animals were killed per period, and the samples were processed for histomorphologic and histometric analysis. Conclusions: The results demonstrated that the wire poliglecaprone 25 showed better biological response, with less inflammatory infiltrates and rapid organization of connective tissue. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Propedeutics, School of Dentistry of Araçatuba São Paulo State University- UNESP, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Cirurgia e Clinica Integrada Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba - UNESP, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University of the State of Sao Paulo, Aracatuba
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Aracaju, Brazil and Integrated Clinic São Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araçatuba
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Propedeutics, School of Dentistry of Araçatuba São Paulo State University- UNESP, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Cirurgia e Clinica Integrada Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba - UNESP, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgery, Aracaju, Brazil and Integrated Clinic São Paulo State University Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Araçatuba
dc.format.extent1-6
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-012-0380-3
dc.identifier.citationOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, p. 1-6.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10006-012-0380-3
dc.identifier.issn1865-1550
dc.identifier.issn1865-1569
dc.identifier.lattes1566928219828056
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84871463898
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74087
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,471
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectComparative study
dc.subjectPoliglecaprone
dc.subjectSuture
dc.subjectVicryl
dc.titleComparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissueen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.springer.com/open+access/authors+rights
unesp.author.lattes1566928219828056
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos - Patologia e Propedêutica Clínica - FOA
Artigos - Cirurgia e Clínica Integrada - FOA