Relationship of aerobic and anaerobic parameters with 400 m front crawl swimming performance

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorKalva-Filho, C. A.
dc.contributor.authorCampos, E. Z.
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, V. L.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, A. S.R.
dc.contributor.authorZagatto, A. M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLima, M. C.S.
dc.contributor.authorPapoti, M.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:43:35Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:43:35Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe aims of the present study were to investigate the relationship of aerobic and anaerobic parameters with 400 m performance, and establish which variable better explains long distance performance in swimming. Twenty-two swimmers (19.1±1.5 years, height 173.9±10.0 cm, body mass 71.2±10.2 kg; 76.6±5.3% of 400 m world record) underwent a lactate minimum test to determine lactate minimum speed (LMS) (i.e., aerobic capacity index). Moreover, the swimmers performed a 400 m maximal effort to determine mean speed (S400m), peak oxygen uptake ( · VO2PEAK) and total anaerobic contribution (CANA). The CANA was assumed as the sum of alactic and lactic contributions. Physiological parameters of 400 m were determined using the backward extrapolation technique ( ·VO2PEAKand alactic contributions of CANA) and blood lactate concentration analysis (lactic anaerobic contributions of CANA). The Pearson correlation test and backward multiple regression analysis were used to verify the possible correlations between the physiological indices (predictor factors) and S400m (independent variable) (p<0.05). Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Significant correlations were observed between S400m (1.4±0.1 m.s-1) and LMS (1.3±0.1 m.s-1; r=0.80), · VO2PEAK ( 4.5±3.9 L.min-1; r=0.72) and CANA ( 4.7±1.5 L · O2; r= 0.44). The best model constructed using multiple regression analysis demonstrated that LMS and · VO2PEAK explained 85% of the 400 m performance variance. When backward multiple regression analysis was performed, CANA lost significance. Thus, the results demonstrated that both aerobic parameters (capacity and power) can be used to predict 400 m swimming performance.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Rehabilitation and Functional Performance University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Biosciences State University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto University of São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartament of Physical Education University of São Paulo State (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartament of Physical Education University of São Paulo State (UNESP)
dc.format.extent333-337
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1188611
dc.identifier.citationBiology of Sport, v. 32, n. 4, p. 333-337, 2015.
dc.identifier.doi10.5604/20831862.1188611
dc.identifier.issn2083-1862
dc.identifier.issn0860-021X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84983242581
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/168907
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBiology of Sport
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAerobic capacity
dc.subjectAerobic power
dc.subjectAnaerobic contribution
dc.subjectPhysiological profile
dc.titleRelationship of aerobic and anaerobic parameters with 400 m front crawl swimming performanceen
dc.typeArtigo
unesp.author.lattes2545518618024469[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1065-4158[5]

Arquivos

Coleções

Artigos