Anuran species in Brazil's protected areas network
dc.contributor.author | Morais, Alessandro Ribeiro | |
dc.contributor.author | Andreani, Tainã Lucas | |
dc.contributor.author | Alves, Rhayane | |
dc.contributor.author | Dos Santos, Carolina Emília | |
dc.contributor.author | Barros, Jhonatan | |
dc.contributor.author | Rezende, Wadson Rodrigues [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Lemes, Priscila | |
dc.contributor.institution | Instituto Federal Goiano | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-12T01:54:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-12T01:54:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Amphibians are one of the most threatened among the vertebrates species and urgently require conservation protection and planning. The establishment of protected areas (PAs) is one of the most important strategies in protecting biodiversity, as they offer a partial solution to habitat modification. Our main objective was to analyse the temporal and spatial trends in the anuran species inventories of PAs in Brazil, therefore providing an extensive list of anuran species in the Brazilian PAs network for the first time. We considered a combination of keywords while using the data on “Scopus”, “Scielo”, and “Web of Science”. We found 115 papers that published anuran species lists for 101 Brazilian protected areas. Overall, we registered 605 species distributed in 20 families. Only seven out of the 605 anuran species registered in the present study are threatened by extinction and 40 are listed as Data Deficient. The number of anuran species inventories in Brazilian protected areas has increased over time (r = 0.17; r2 = 0.267; p<0.01), with its peak in 2011 (n = 15 inventories). The majority of the species inventories were conducted in protected areas located in the Atlantic Forest (55.45 %). The number of anuran species per protected area varied from seven to 80; however, we did not find any relationship between the species richness and size of the protected areas (r2 = 0.027; r = 0.165; p = 0.092). Our results can be useful to fill the gaps and integrate knowledge; and this reinforces the importance of the present study in contributing to the knowledge and conservation of anuran species in Brazil. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Laboratório de Biologia Animal Instituto Federal Goiano, Campus Rio Verde | |
dc.description.affiliation | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Goiás | |
dc.description.affiliation | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Evolução Instituto de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Federal de Goiás | |
dc.description.affiliation | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita”(UNESP), Campus São José do Rio Preto | |
dc.description.affiliation | Departamento de Botânica e Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso | |
dc.description.affiliation | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul | |
dc.description.affiliation | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Conservação Instituto Federal Goiano, Campus Rio Verde | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita”(UNESP), Campus São José do Rio Preto | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | FAPESP: #2014/22344-6 | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás: 2016-10267001018 | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | CNPq: 465610/2014-5 | |
dc.description.sponsorshipId | Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e Comunicações: 465610/2014-5 | |
dc.format.extent | 27-34 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.33256/hj30.1.2734 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Herpetological Journal, v. 30, n. 1, p. 27-34, 2020. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.33256/hj30.1.2734 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0268-0130 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85078562105 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/200001 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Herpetological Journal | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Brazilian biomes | |
dc.subject | Inventory | |
dc.subject | Species list | |
dc.subject | Temporal and spatial trends | |
dc.title | Anuran species in Brazil's protected areas network | en |
dc.type | Artigo | |
unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Biociências Letras e Ciências Exatas, São José do Rio Preto | pt |
unesp.department | Biologia - IBILCE | pt |