Conventional and whitening toothpastes: Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and effect on the enamel surface

dc.contributor.authorAfonso Camargo, Samira Esteves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJoias, Renata Pilli [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantana-Melo, Gabriela Fatima [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Lara Tolentino [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro El Achkar, Vivian Narana [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRode, Sigmar de Mello [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-03T15:30:53Z
dc.date.available2015-11-03T15:30:53Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of whitening and common toothpastes, and the surface roughness of tooth enamel submitted to brushing with both toothpastes. Methods: Samples of whitening toothpastes [Colgate Whitening (CW) and Oral-B Whitening (OBW)] and regular (non-whitening) toothpastes (Colgate and Oral-B) were extracted in culture medium. Gingival human fibroblasts (FMM-1) were placed in contact with different dilutions of culture media that had been previously exposed to such materials, and the cytotoxicity was evaluated using the MTT assay. The genotoxicity was assessed by the micronucleus formation assay in Chinese hamster fibroblasts (V79). The cell survival rate and micronuclei number were assessed before and after exposure to the toothpaste extracts. For the surface roughness evaluation, 20 bovine tooth specimens, divided into four groups according to toothpastes, were submitted to 10,000 brushing cycles. The results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U and two-way ANOVA tests (P< 0.05). Results: MTT assay showed that Colgate was significantly less cytotoxic than CW, Oral-B and OBW at all dilutions (P< 0.01). CW was the most cytotoxic toothpaste (P< 0.01). The whitening toothpastes showed the highest numbers of micronuclei compared to the untreated control (UC) (P< 0.01). Colgate and Oral-B toothpastes were not genotoxic compared to UC (P= 0.326). The OBW toothpaste was statistically significantly abrasive to the enamel surface (P< 0.01). The whitening toothpastes and Oral-B were cytotoxic to the cells. The whitening toothpastes were more genotoxic to cells in vitro than the common toothpastes, and genotoxicity was more pronounced in the OBW toothpaste.en
dc.description.affiliationPaulista State Univ Julio Mesquita Filho UNESP, Inst Sci &Technol, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniversidade Estaudal Paulista, Inst Sci & Technol, BR-12245000 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.format.extent307-311
dc.identifierhttp://www.amjdent.com/previousarticles.htm
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal Of Dentistry. Weston: Mosher &linder, Inc, v. 27, n. 6, p. 307-311, 2014.
dc.identifier.issn0894-8275
dc.identifier.lattes3422118958429909
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/130271
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000348094700005
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMosher &linder, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal Of Dentistry
dc.relation.ispartofjcr0.760
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,509
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleConventional and whitening toothpastes: Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and effect on the enamel surfaceen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderMosher &linder, Inc
unesp.author.lattes3422118958429909
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4261-4217[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos