Photobiomodulation by Led Does Not Alter Muscle Recovery Indicators and Presents Similar Outcomes to Cold-Water Immersion and Active Recovery

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorMalta, Elvis de Souza [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLira, Fabio Santos de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMachado, Fabiana Andrade
dc.contributor.authorZago, Anderson Saranz [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAmaral, Sandra Lia do [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorZagatto, Alessandro Moura [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T12:34:24Z
dc.date.available2019-10-04T12:34:24Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-14
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) on muscle recovery based on inflammation (interleukin-10 [IL-10]; tumor necrosis factor-alpha [TNF alpha]), muscle damage markers (creatine kinase [CK]; lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), delay onset muscle soreness (DOMS), and countermovement jump performance (CMJ) after two sprint interval training (SIT) sessions compared with a placebo condition (part-I), as well as to compare the effectiveness of PBMT with active recovery (AR) and cold-water immersion (CWI) (part-II). Methods: Part-I was conducted as a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study and part-II as a parallel-group study. Thirty-six men participated in the studies (12 participants in part-I and 36 participants in part-II). Volunteers performed two SITs interspaced by 24-h (SIT1 and SIT2) to mimic the effect of accumulating 2 consecutive days of SIT. In part-I, only after SIT2, PBMT [Total energy: 600J (300J per leg in 5 spots); wavelength: 660-850 nm] or placebo interventions were performed, while in part-II PBMT (part-I data), AR (15-min; 50% of the maximal aerobic power), or CWI (10-min; 10 degrees C) were carried out, also after SIT2. Blood samples were collected before (i.e., baseline), and 0.5, 1, 24, 48, and 72-h after SIT2, while CMJ and DOMS were measured before, 24, 48, and 72-h after SIT2. Results: In part-I, there were no interactions between PBMT and placebo conditions for any blood markers (P >= 0.313), DOMS (P = 0.052), and CMJ (P = 0.295). However, an effect of time was found with increases in LDH, CK, and IL-10 (P <= 0.043) as well as a decrease in DOMS at 72-h compared with 24-h (P = 0.012). In part-II, there were no interactions between the PBMT, AR, and CWI groups for any markers at the same moments (P >= 0.189) and for the peak and integral values (P >= 0.193), for DOMS (P = 0.314) and CMJ (P = 0.264). However, an effect of time was found with an increase in CK and IL-10 (P = 0.003), while DOMS decreased at 48 and 72-h compared with 24-h (P = 0.001). Conclusion: In summary, PBMT had no effect on inflammation, muscle damage, CMJ performance, or DOMS after two consecutive sprint interval training sessions compared to placebo, CWI, and AR strategies.en
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Lab Physiol & Sport Performance, Sch Sci, Bauru, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Sci & Technol, Dept Phys Educ, Presidente Prudente, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Maringa, Dept Phys Educ, Grp Studies & Res Exercise Physiol Appl Humans, Maringa, Parana, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Sch Sci, Bauru, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Lab Physiol & Sport Performance, Sch Sci, Bauru, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Sch Sci & Technol, Dept Phys Educ, Presidente Prudente, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Sch Sci, Bauru, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2015/05012-2
dc.format.extent11
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01948
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers In Physiology. Lausanne: Frontiers Media Sa, v. 9, 11 p., 2019.
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2018.01948
dc.identifier.issn1664-042X
dc.identifier.lattes1329771683586073
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9645-1003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/185312
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000455665100001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media Sa
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers In Physiology
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectlow-level light therapy
dc.subjecthigh-intensity interval training
dc.subjectinflammation
dc.subjectinterleukin-10
dc.subjecttumor necrosis factor-alpha
dc.subjectcreatine kinase
dc.subjectL-lactate dehydrogenase
dc.titlePhotobiomodulation by Led Does Not Alter Muscle Recovery Indicators and Presents Similar Outcomes to Cold-Water Immersion and Active Recoveryen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderFrontiers Media Sa
unesp.author.lattes2545518618024469[3]
unesp.author.lattes2980528637146416[4]
unesp.author.lattes1329771683586073(2)
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1065-4158[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0081-0797[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9645-1003(2)
unesp.departmentEducação Física - FCpt

Arquivos

Coleções

Bauru - FC - Faculdade de Ciências
Artigos - Estatística - FCT