A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses

Página do item simplificado
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Ana Cláudia Tavares [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGarcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMedola, Fausto Orsi [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBaleotti, Luciana Ramos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSandnes, Frode Eika
dc.contributor.authorVaezipour, Atiyeh
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionOslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet)
dc.contributor.institutionKristiania University College
dc.contributor.institutionThe University of Queensland
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-29T13:29:34Z
dc.date.available2023-07-29T13:29:34Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractRapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-user evaluation.en
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Design – PPGDesign-UNESP São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationGraduate Program in Human Development and Technologies São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationOslo Metropolitan University (OsloMet)
dc.description.affiliationKristiania University College
dc.description.affiliationRECOVER Injury Research Centre The University of Queensland
dc.description.affiliationUnespGraduate Program in Design – PPGDesign-UNESP São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationUnespGraduate Program in Human Development and Technologies São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.format.extent53-60
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_7
dc.identifier.citationLecture Notes in Networks and Systems, v. 274, p. 53-60.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-80462-6_7
dc.identifier.issn2367-3389
dc.identifier.issn2367-3370
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85142294781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/247923
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofLecture Notes in Networks and Systems
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subject3D printing
dc.subjectAssistive technology
dc.subjectOrthosis
dc.subjectRapid prototyping
dc.titleA Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthosesen
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento
unesp.departmentDesign - FAACpt

Arquivos

Coleções

Bauru - FAAC - Faculdade de Arquitetura, Artes, Comunicação e Design