Publicação: A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems
dc.contributor.author | Paredes, Helmo K. M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Marafao, Fernando P. [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Silva, Luiz C. P. da | |
dc.contributor.author | Toma, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Otomega, B. | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-12-10T22:02:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-12-10T22:02:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper investigates the main similarities and discrepancies among three important current decompositions proposed for the consideration of unbalanced and/or non linear three-phase three-wire power circuits. The considered approaches were the so called FBD Theory, the pq-Theory and the Conservative Power Theory (CPT), recently presented by Tenti et al.. Such decompositions and related definitions may influence the power measurement techniques, revenue metering, instrumentation technology and also power conditioning strategies. The three methods have been summarized, discussed and compared by means of computational simulation. Although the three methods are based on different concepts, the results obtained under ideal conditions are very similar. The main differences appear in the presence of unbalanced and non linear load conditions. Under linear unbalanced conditions, both FBD and pq-Theory suggest that the some current components contain a third-order harmonic. Besides, neither pq-Theory nor FBI) method are able to provide accurate information for reactive current under unbalanced and distorted conditions, what can be done by means of the CPT-Theory. The paper tries to explain the causes of these differences in terms of the decomposition's foundations and the resulting waveforms and spectra. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Univ Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil | |
dc.description.affiliation | Sao Paulo State Univ, Grp Automat & Integrating Syst, Sao Paulo, Brazil | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Sao Paulo State Univ, Grp Automat & Integrating Syst, Sao Paulo, Brazil | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação para o Desenvolvimento da UNESP (FUNDUNESP) | |
dc.format.extent | 909-+ | |
dc.identifier.citation | 2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5. New York: Ieee, p. 909-+, 2009. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/197394 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000276834600139 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Ieee | |
dc.relation.ispartof | 2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5 | |
dc.source | Web of Science | |
dc.subject | FBD theory | |
dc.subject | pq-Theory | |
dc.subject | Homo-variables | |
dc.subject | harmonics | |
dc.subject | current decomposition | |
dc.subject | power theory | |
dc.title | A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems | en |
dc.type | Trabalho apresentado em evento | |
dcterms.license | http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/rights_policies.html | |
dcterms.rightsHolder | Ieee | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Sorocaba | pt |
unesp.department | Engenharia de Controle e Automação - ICTS | pt |