Publicação:
A Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systems

dc.contributor.authorParedes, Helmo K. M.
dc.contributor.authorMarafao, Fernando P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Luiz C. P. da
dc.contributor.authorToma, L.
dc.contributor.authorOtomega, B.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-10T22:02:02Z
dc.date.available2020-12-10T22:02:02Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the main similarities and discrepancies among three important current decompositions proposed for the consideration of unbalanced and/or non linear three-phase three-wire power circuits. The considered approaches were the so called FBD Theory, the pq-Theory and the Conservative Power Theory (CPT), recently presented by Tenti et al.. Such decompositions and related definitions may influence the power measurement techniques, revenue metering, instrumentation technology and also power conditioning strategies. The three methods have been summarized, discussed and compared by means of computational simulation. Although the three methods are based on different concepts, the results obtained under ideal conditions are very similar. The main differences appear in the presence of unbalanced and non linear load conditions. Under linear unbalanced conditions, both FBD and pq-Theory suggest that the some current components contain a third-order harmonic. Besides, neither pq-Theory nor FBI) method are able to provide accurate information for reactive current under unbalanced and distorted conditions, what can be done by means of the CPT-Theory. The paper tries to explain the causes of these differences in terms of the decomposition's foundations and the resulting waveforms and spectra.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Automat & Integrating Syst, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespSao Paulo State Univ, Grp Automat & Integrating Syst, Sao Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para o Desenvolvimento da UNESP (FUNDUNESP)
dc.format.extent909-+
dc.identifier.citation2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5. New York: Ieee, p. 909-+, 2009.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/197394
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000276834600139
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIeee
dc.relation.ispartof2009 Ieee Bucharest Powertech, Vols 1-5
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectFBD theory
dc.subjectpq-Theory
dc.subjectHomo-variables
dc.subjectharmonics
dc.subjectcurrent decomposition
dc.subjectpower theory
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of FBD, PQ and CPT Current Decompositions Part I: Three-Phase Three-Wire Systemsen
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento
dcterms.licensehttp://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/rights_policies.html
dcterms.rightsHolderIeee
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Sorocabapt
unesp.departmentEngenharia de Controle e Automação - ICTSpt

Arquivos