Publicação: From no whinge scenarios to viability tree
dc.contributor.author | Doyen, L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Armstrong, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Baumgärtner, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Béné, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Blanchard, F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cissé, A. A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cooper, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Dutra, L. X.C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Eide, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Freitas, D. [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Gourguet, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Gusmao, F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Hardy, P. Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jarre, A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Little, L. R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Macher, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Quaas, M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Regnier, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanz, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Thébaud, O. | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Bordeaux | |
dc.contributor.institution | University Tromsoe | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Friburg | |
dc.contributor.institution | Decision and Policy Analysis Program | |
dc.contributor.institution | UMR IFREMER-CNRS-University of Cayenne | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Cape Town | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.contributor.institution | Oceans and Atmosphere | |
dc.contributor.institution | Département d'Economie Maritime | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Leipzig | |
dc.contributor.institution | The University of the South Pacific | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Tasmania | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-06T15:44:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-06T15:44:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Avoiding whinges from various and potentially conflicting stakeholders is a major challenge for sustainable development and for the identification of sustainability scenarios or policies for biodiversity and ecosystem services. It turns out that independently complying with whinge thresholds and constraints of these stakeholders is not sufficient because dynamic ecological-economic interactions and uncertainties occur. Thus more demanding no whinge standards are needed. In this paper, we first argue that these new boundaries can be endogenously exhibited with the mathematical concepts of viability kernel and viable controls. Second, it is shown how these no whinge kernels have components, such as harvesting of resources, that should remain within safe corridor while some other components, in particular biodiversity, have only lower conservation limits. Thus, using radar charts, we show how this no whinge kernels can take the shape of a tree that we name viability tree. These trees of viability capture the idea that the unbounded renewal potential of biodiversity combined with a bounded use of the different ecosystem services are crucial ingredients for the sustainability of socio-ecosystems and the design of no whinge policies reconciling the different stakeholders involved. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | GREThA CNRS University of Bordeaux | |
dc.description.affiliation | UiT Norwegian College of Fishery Science University Tromsoe | |
dc.description.affiliation | Environmental Economics and Resource Management University of Friburg | |
dc.description.affiliation | CIAT Decision and Policy Analysis Program | |
dc.description.affiliation | LEEISA UMR IFREMER-CNRS-University of Cayenne | |
dc.description.affiliation | MARE Institute University of Cape Town | |
dc.description.affiliation | State University of São Paulo UNESP, Coastal Campus | |
dc.description.affiliation | FAPESP & Instituto do Mar Federal University of Sao Paulo | |
dc.description.affiliation | CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere | |
dc.description.affiliation | IFREMER UMR AMURE Département d'Economie Maritime | |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Economics and iDiv University of Leipzig | |
dc.description.affiliation | School of Marine Studies The University of the South Pacific | |
dc.description.affiliation | Centre for Marine Socioecology University of Tasmania | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | State University of São Paulo UNESP, Coastal Campus | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Centre Elile Borel, Institut Henri-Poincaré | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) | |
dc.format.extent | 183-188 | |
dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Ecological Economics, v. 163, p. 183-188. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0921-8009 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85066618424 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/187711 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ecological Economics | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso aberto | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Ecological economics | |
dc.subject | Minimal whinge | |
dc.subject | Modeling | |
dc.subject | Safe operating space | |
dc.subject | Scenarios | |
dc.subject | Sustainability | |
dc.subject | Viability kernel | |
dc.title | From no whinge scenarios to viability tree | en |
dc.type | Artigo | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-8272-6187[1] |