Publicação:
From no whinge scenarios to viability tree

dc.contributor.authorDoyen, L.
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, C.
dc.contributor.authorBaumgärtner, S.
dc.contributor.authorBéné, C.
dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, F.
dc.contributor.authorCissé, A. A.
dc.contributor.authorCooper, R.
dc.contributor.authorDutra, L. X.C.
dc.contributor.authorEide, A.
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, D. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGourguet, S.
dc.contributor.authorGusmao, F.
dc.contributor.authorHardy, P. Y.
dc.contributor.authorJarre, A.
dc.contributor.authorLittle, L. R.
dc.contributor.authorMacher, C.
dc.contributor.authorQuaas, M.
dc.contributor.authorRegnier, E.
dc.contributor.authorSanz, N.
dc.contributor.authorThébaud, O.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Bordeaux
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Tromsoe
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Friburg
dc.contributor.institutionDecision and Policy Analysis Program
dc.contributor.institutionUMR IFREMER-CNRS-University of Cayenne
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionOceans and Atmosphere
dc.contributor.institutionDépartement d'Economie Maritime
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Leipzig
dc.contributor.institutionThe University of the South Pacific
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Tasmania
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T15:44:55Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T15:44:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01
dc.description.abstractAvoiding whinges from various and potentially conflicting stakeholders is a major challenge for sustainable development and for the identification of sustainability scenarios or policies for biodiversity and ecosystem services. It turns out that independently complying with whinge thresholds and constraints of these stakeholders is not sufficient because dynamic ecological-economic interactions and uncertainties occur. Thus more demanding no whinge standards are needed. In this paper, we first argue that these new boundaries can be endogenously exhibited with the mathematical concepts of viability kernel and viable controls. Second, it is shown how these no whinge kernels have components, such as harvesting of resources, that should remain within safe corridor while some other components, in particular biodiversity, have only lower conservation limits. Thus, using radar charts, we show how this no whinge kernels can take the shape of a tree that we name viability tree. These trees of viability capture the idea that the unbounded renewal potential of biodiversity combined with a bounded use of the different ecosystem services are crucial ingredients for the sustainability of socio-ecosystems and the design of no whinge policies reconciling the different stakeholders involved.en
dc.description.affiliationGREThA CNRS University of Bordeaux
dc.description.affiliationUiT Norwegian College of Fishery Science University Tromsoe
dc.description.affiliationEnvironmental Economics and Resource Management University of Friburg
dc.description.affiliationCIAT Decision and Policy Analysis Program
dc.description.affiliationLEEISA UMR IFREMER-CNRS-University of Cayenne
dc.description.affiliationMARE Institute University of Cape Town
dc.description.affiliationState University of São Paulo UNESP, Coastal Campus
dc.description.affiliationFAPESP & Instituto do Mar Federal University of Sao Paulo
dc.description.affiliationCSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere
dc.description.affiliationIFREMER UMR AMURE Département d'Economie Maritime
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Economics and iDiv University of Leipzig
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Marine Studies The University of the South Pacific
dc.description.affiliationCentre for Marine Socioecology University of Tasmania
dc.description.affiliationUnespState University of São Paulo UNESP, Coastal Campus
dc.description.sponsorshipCentre Elile Borel, Institut Henri-Poincaré
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.format.extent183-188
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.011
dc.identifier.citationEcological Economics, v. 163, p. 183-188.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.011
dc.identifier.issn0921-8009
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85066618424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/187711
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Economics
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEcological economics
dc.subjectMinimal whinge
dc.subjectModeling
dc.subjectSafe operating space
dc.subjectScenarios
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectViability kernel
dc.titleFrom no whinge scenarios to viability treeen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8272-6187[1]

Arquivos

Coleções