A snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil

dc.contributor.authorMillen, D. D. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPacheco, R. D. L. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorArrigoni, Mario de Beni [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGalyean, M. L.
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, J. T.
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Nebraska
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionTexas Tech Univ
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:26:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:40:28Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:26:55Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:40:28Z
dc.date.issued2009-10-01
dc.description.abstractFeedlot consulting nutritionists were invited to participate in a survey of feedlot nutritional and management practices in Brazil. Thirty-one nutritionists completed the survey on a Web site that was designed for collection of survey data. The survey consisted of 94 questions that included general information (n = 10); commodity information (n = 12); and questions about the use of coproducts (n = 5), roughage source and levels (n = 5), finishing diet adaptation methods (n = 7), supplements and micronutrients (n = 8), feed mixers (n = 6), feeding management (n = 3), cattle management and type of cattle fed (n = 16), formulation practices (n = 17), information resources used for nutritional recommendations (n = 2), and 2 additional questions. One final question addressed the primary challenges associated with applying nutritional recommendations in practice. The number of animals serviced yearly by each nutritionist averaged 121,682 (minimum = 2,000; maximum = 1,500,000; mode = 120,000; total = 3,163,750). Twenty-two respondents (71%) worked with feedlots that feed less than 5,000 animals/yr. Labor, along with availability and precision of equipment, seemed to be the main challenges for the nutritionists surveyed. Most of the nutritionists surveyed used TDN as the primary energy unit for formulation. More than 50% of the clients serviced by the 31 nutritionists did not manage feed bunks to control the quantity of feed offered per pen, and 36.6% fed cattle more than 4 times daily. The NRC (1996) and Journal of Animal Science were the most used sources of information by these nutritionists. Overall, general practices and nutritional recommendations provided by the 31 nutritionists surveyed were fairly consistent. Present data should aid in development of new research, future National Research Council models, and recommendations for Brazilian feeding systems in which Bos indicus cattle predominate.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Nebraska, Panhandle Res & Extens Ctr, Scottsbluff, NE 69361 USA
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Melhoramento & Nutr Anim, BR-18618000 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationTexas Tech Univ, Dept Anim & Food Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista, Dept Melhoramento & Nutr Anim, BR-18618000 São Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent3427-3439
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1880
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Science. Champaign: Amer Soc Animal Science, v. 87, n. 10, p. 3427-3439, 2009.
dc.identifier.doi10.2527/jas.2009-1880
dc.identifier.issn0021-8812
dc.identifier.lattes0555360557852992
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/14052
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000269933500039
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmer Soc Animal Science
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Science
dc.relation.ispartofjcr1.711
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,848
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbeef cattleen
dc.subjectBrazilen
dc.subjectfeedloten
dc.subjectnutritionisten
dc.subjectrecommendationen
dc.titleA snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazilen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://journalofanimalscience.org/site/misc/ifora.xhtml
dcterms.rightsHolderAmer Soc Animal Science
unesp.author.lattes0555360557852992
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3224-1688[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Tecnológicas, Dracenapt
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Botucatupt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote
Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: