Characterizing background heterogeneity in visual communication

dc.contributor.authorCamargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCazetta, Eliana
dc.contributor.authorMorellato, Leonor Patricia C. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSchaefer, H. Martin
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Estadual Santa Cruz
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Freiburg
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-18T15:53:19Z
dc.date.available2015-03-18T15:53:19Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01
dc.description.abstractHow is a visual signal effectively transmitted through an environment triggering a response by a perceiver? Experimental and theoretical works in disparate fields, such as sexual selection and plant animal interactions, have demonstrated selection based on signal conspicuousness. However, to properly describe the conspicuousness of a signal, it is necessary to quantify the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of background coloration of a signaler. We intend to compare the effectiveness of four methods developed to characterize background heterogeneity. To describe the background in a seasonal vegetation, we collected reflectance data in dry and wet seasons of (i) target leaves (those leaves against which a signal is predominantly displayed); (ii) overall leaves (leaves from the most common plant species in the community); (iii)frames in a limited area in space, by measuring the reflectance of all material found in the background; and (iv) background items from the most common species, based on their abundance along transects. We analyzed seasonal color changes in terms of hue, chroma and brightness and described the conspicuousness of fruit coloration according to avian vision. All methods found significant differences in the background coloration between seasons, with higher reflectance values in the dry season. Hue values were higher in the dry season, and chroma values were higher in the wet season. Only the methods most restricted in space (target leaves and frames) recorded seasonal differences in fruit conspicuousness. The transects and frames methods are useful for describing the backgrounds of non-stationary signals (i.e., those of most animals). For plant signals, which are displayed against a fixed background in space, we recommend specific sampling of target leaves. Our results support the importance of measuring the seasonal heterogeneity of the background but also indicate that a monthly sampling design is not necessary to evaluate the conspicuousness of fruit signals.en
dc.description.affiliationUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Lab Fenol, Dept Bot, Grp Fenol & Dispersao Sementes, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Santa Cruz, Dept Ciencias Biol, BR-45662900 Ilheus, BA, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Freiburg, Fac Biol, Dept Evolutionary Biol & Anim Ecol, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
dc.description.affiliationUnespUNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Lab Fenol, Dept Bot, Grp Fenol & Dispersao Sementes, BR-13506900 Rio Claro, SP, Brazil
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipUNESP Rio Claro
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 07/59779-6
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 10/51307-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 10/01762-3
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 12/19827-0
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 10/52113-5
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 481400/2011-7
dc.format.extent326-335
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2014.06.002
dc.identifier.citationBasic And Applied Ecology. Jena: Elsevier Gmbh, Urban & Fischer Verlag, v. 15, n. 4, p. 326-335, 2014.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.baae.2014.06.002
dc.identifier.issn1439-1791
dc.identifier.lattes1012217731137451
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/116444
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000340140900006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofBasic And Applied Ecology
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.144
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,108
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectSignalen
dc.subjectCamouflageen
dc.subjectCerrado savannaen
dc.subjectCrypsisen
dc.subjectFrugivoryen
dc.subjectFruit coloren
dc.subjectFruit contrasten
dc.subjectPlant-animal interactionsen
dc.subjectPollinationen
dc.subjectSeasonalityen
dc.titleCharacterizing background heterogeneity in visual communicationen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.elsevier.com/about/open-access/open-access-policies/article-posting-policy
dcterms.rightsHolderElsevier B.V.
unesp.author.lattes1012217731137451
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5265-8988[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3536-6542[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2209-2554[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Instituto de Biociências, Rio Claropt
unesp.departmentBotânica - IBpt

Arquivos