Logo do repositório

Comparison of factors associated with the evidence-practice gap as perceived by Japanese and Brazilian dentists

dc.contributor.authorKakudate, Naoki
dc.contributor.authorYokoyama, Yoko
dc.contributor.authorTagliaferro, Elaine Pereira da Silva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSumida, Futoshi
dc.contributor.authorMatsumoto, Yuki
dc.contributor.authorGordan, Valeria V
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Gregg H
dc.contributor.institutionKyushu Dental University
dc.contributor.institutionKeio University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionDaiich Dental Clinic
dc.contributor.institutionMatsumoto Dental Clinic
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:15:21Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To identify 1) factors of the evidence-practice gap (EPG) in Japan and Brazil as perceived by dentists and compare these factors between two countries, and 2) mechanisms to close this EPG. Methods: The study employed a cross-sectional design by administering a web-based questionnaire to 136 Japanese and 110 Brazilian dentists. The survey queried dentists’ reports of which factors possibly cause an EPG, using a newly developed 20-item questionnaire. Results: An international comparison of 20 items related to factors of the EPG between Japan and Brazil revealed that Dentists' own experiences are sometimes given priority over evidence and Dentists' own thoughts are sometimes given priority over evidence were common factors to both countries, with over 80 % agreement. In logistic regression, Insufficient opportunity to learn about evidence in dental education at universities, Evidence-based treatments are sometimes not covered by the dental insurance system, and Insufficient evidence which helps dentists choose an appropriate treatment for a patient after careful consideration of his/her own background were significantly associated with the EPG in Japan (p < 0.05). In Brazil, Insufficient case reports in which evidence-based dentistry (EBD) is applied to clinical practice and Image-based information and devices used for diagnosis vary depending on individual dentists were significantly associated with the EPG (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study suggests that EPG could be improved in Japan: by promoting EBD education at universities, improving the dental insurance system, and accumulating evidence according to patient background; and in Brazil: by promoting EBD case reports and standardizing diagnostic information and devices. Clinical Significance: Two factors of EPG common to Japan and Brazil, namely the prioritization of dentists' own experiences and thoughts over evidence, are urgent issues for improving EPG. In addition, it will be necessary to address the country-specific factors of EPG that were identified in this study.en
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Clinical Epidemiology Kyushu Dental University, 2-6-1, Manazuru, Kokura-kita, Fukuoka
dc.description.affiliationGraduate School of Media and Governance Keio University, 5322 Endo Fujisawa
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Community Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Centro, SP
dc.description.affiliationDaiich Dental Clinic, 5-5-7, Hanazono, Hokkaido
dc.description.affiliationMatsumoto Dental Clinic, 24-3, Komanomai, Doimachi, Aichi
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences at the University of Florida College of Dentistry, Room D3-39 P.O. Box 100415
dc.description.affiliationEndowed Chair of Dental Research and Chair Department of Clinical and Community Sciences School of Dentistry University of Alabama at Birmingham, Room SDB 109, 1720 Second Avenue South
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Community Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry, Araraquara, Rua Humaitá, 1680, Centro, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105255
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, v. 149.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105255
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85199711327
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/302704
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEvidence-based dentistry
dc.subjectEvidence-practice gap
dc.subjectInternational comparison
dc.subjectMinimal intervention dentistry
dc.subjectPractice-based research
dc.titleComparison of factors associated with the evidence-practice gap as perceived by Japanese and Brazilian dentistsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3259-411X[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0381-5996[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt

Arquivos