Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Cytotoxicity of root canal irrigating solutions and photodynamic therapy using curcumin photosensitizer

dc.contributor.authorStrazzi-Sahyon, H. B. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCintra, L. T.A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNakao, J. M. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTakamiya, A. S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz, I. O.A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos, P. H. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Sandra Helena Penha de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSivieri-Araujo, G. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:41:17Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:41:17Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-01
dc.description.abstractBackground: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has shown satisfactory antibacterial effects. However, little information regarding the cytotoxicity potential of PDT using curcumin as a photosensitizer (PS) on fibroblasts are found. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of root canal irrigating solutions and photodynamic therapy with curcumin PS on the L-929 cell line. Methods: Healthy mouse skin fibroblast cells were distributed into the following 7 experimental groups: G1 – culture medium DMEM (control group); G2 – 0.9% sodium chloride; G3 – 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); G4 – 5% NaOCl; G5 – PDT with curcumin PS at 500 mg/L + blue LED; G6 – PDT with curcumin PS at 750 mg/L + blue LED; and G7 - PDT with curcumin PS at 1000 mg/L + blue LED. All experimental groups which underwent PDT action were submitted to blue LED for 4 min, with a wavelength of 480 nm and energy fluency of 75 J/cm². The cultures were maintained under standard cell culture conditions (37°C, 100% humidity, 5% CO2). Cell viability analysis was performed using the colorimetric method to evaluate the periods of 6, 24, and 48 h. Data were subjected to the Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by the Dunn test to compare groups and Friedman test to compare periods (α = 0.05). Results: When comparing the periods, no significant differences were observed for any of the experimental groups analyzed (p > 0.05), except for the NaOCl2.5 group that exhibited higher cell viability at 6 h compared to the period of 48 h (p = 0.0489). In the comparisons of the experimental groups, there were no statistically significant differences between the control group compared to all disinfection protocols, regardless of the period evaluated (p > 0.05), except for the PDT + C1000 group that showed lower cell viability (P < 0.05). Conclusions: PDT with curcumin at 1000 mg/L was cytotoxic on L-929 fibroblast cell culture. However, laser-activated curcumin at a concentration of 500 mg/L presented no influence on L-929 fibroblast cell viability in in vitro conditions.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry Discipline of Endodontics Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua José Bonifácio, 1193, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Basic Sciences Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry Discipline of Endodontics Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua José Bonifácio, 1193, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Surgery and Integrated Clinic Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Basic Sciences Araçatuba School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102795
dc.identifier.citationPhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy, v. 38.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102795
dc.identifier.issn1873-1597
dc.identifier.issn1572-1000
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126970252
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/230628
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhotodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCurcumin
dc.subjectCytotoxicity
dc.subjectFibroblasts
dc.subjectPhotodynamic therapy
dc.subjectRoot canal irrigants
dc.subjectRoot canal therapy
dc.titleCytotoxicity of root canal irrigating solutions and photodynamic therapy using curcumin photosensitizeren
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-7014-0437[1]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentCirurgia e Clínica Integrada - FOApt
unesp.departmentCiências Básicas - FOApt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOApt

Arquivos