Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Effect of different adhesive strategies and storage time on bond strength of bi-functional monomers to simulated endodontically-treated dentin

dc.contributor.authorGirotto, Aline Carvalho [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAbuna, Gabriel
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Puetate, Cristian [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPiccioni, Mayra Andressa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorPorto, Thiago Soares
dc.contributor.authorKuga, Milton Carlos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionEast Carolina University
dc.contributor.institutionThe Ohio State University
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-01T11:07:36Z
dc.date.available2022-05-01T11:07:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractAdhesive strategies were evaluated on the bond strength of bi-functional monomers bonded to endodontically-treated-dentin (ETD). Superficial dentin was removed on human molars. Teeth were immersed in 5 mL 2.5% NaOCl, followed by immersion in 5 mL 17% EDTA. Dentin surface impregnated with epoxy resin-based sealer was then divided four groups (n=10): Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (SBMP); Single Bond Universal (SBU); Optibond All-in-One (OPB); and Tetric-N-Bond Universal (TBU). After 24-h or 1-year-of-storage specimens were submitted to microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and failure classification. A confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) evaluated the hybrid layer formation. Two-way ANOVA and Tukey-HSD test were performed (α=5%). The µTBS did not present statistical differences among adhesive strategies after 24-h. Significant differences were found after 1-year-of-storage. CLSM analysis showed water infiltration and consequently degradation of the hybrid layer after 1-year-of-storage. The use of SBU universal adhesive on the self-etching mode on ETD produced more stable bond over the 1-year-of-storage.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Humaitá 1680
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of General Dentistry School of Dental Medicine East Carolina University, 1851 MacGregor Downs Rd
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry College of Dentistry The Ohio State University, 305 W 12th Ave
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rua Humaitá 1680
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 001
dc.format.extent1410-1417
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-074
dc.identifier.citationDental Materials Journal, v. 40, n. 6, p. 1410-1417, 2021.
dc.identifier.doi10.4012/dmj.2021-074
dc.identifier.issn1881-1361
dc.identifier.issn0287-4547
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120520428
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/233869
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDental Materials Journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAdhesives
dc.subjectEndodontically-treated-dentin
dc.subjectMicrotensile
dc.subjectSelf-etching
dc.titleEffect of different adhesive strategies and storage time on bond strength of bi-functional monomers to simulated endodontically-treated dentinen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication901124bf-5736-4432-b057-7c29dec84b50
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery901124bf-5736-4432-b057-7c29dec84b50
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - FOARpt

Arquivos