Publicação: Bond strength durability of direct and indirect composite systems following surface conditioning for repair
dc.contributor.author | Passos, Sheila Pestana [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Özcan, Mutlu | |
dc.contributor.author | Vanderlei, Aleska Dias [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Leite, Fabiola Pessoa Pereira [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Kimpara, Estevão Tomomitsu [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.author | Bottino, Marco Antonio [UNESP] | |
dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor.institution | University of Groningen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-27T11:22:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-27T11:22:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-11-16 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of surface conditioning methods and thermocycling on the bond strength between a resin composite and an indirect composite system in order to test the repair bond strength. Materials and Methods: Eighteen blocks (5 x 5 x 4 mm) of indirect resin composite (Sinfony) were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of the following two treatment conditions (9 blocks per treatment): (1) 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 90 s (Dentsply) + silanization, (2) silica coating with 30-Ìm SiOx particles (CoJet) + silanization. After surface conditioning, the bonding agent was applied (Adper Single Bond) and light polymerized. The composite resin (W3D Master) was condensed and polymerized incrementally to form a block. Following storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h, the indirect composite/resin blocks were sectioned in two axes (x and y) with a diamond disk under coolant irrigation to obtain nontrimmed specimens (sticks) with approximately 0.6 mm2 of bonding area. Twelve specimens were obtained per block (N = 216, n = 108 sticks). The specimens from each repaired block were again randomly divided into 2 groups and tested either after storage in water for 24 h or thermocycling (6000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C). The microtensile bond strength test was performed in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 1 mm/min). The mean bond strengths of the specimens of each block were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results: Both surface conditioning (p = 0.0001) and storage conditions (p = 0.0001) had a significant effect on the results. After 24 h water storage, silica coating and silanization (method 2) showed significantly higher bond strength results (46.4 ± 13.8 MPa) than that of hydrofluoric acid etching and silanization (method 1) (35.8 ± 9.7 MPa) (p < 0.001). After thermocycling, no significant difference was found between the mean bond strengths obtained with method 1 (34.1 ± 8.9 MPa) and method 2 (31.9 ± 7.9 MPa) (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Although after 24 h of testing, silica coating and silanization performed significantly better in resin-resin repair bond strength, both HF acid gel and silica coating followed by silanization revealed comparable bond strength results after thermocycling for 6000 times. | en |
dc.description.affiliation | Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University at São José Dos Campos | |
dc.description.affiliation | University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Department of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene, Groningen | |
dc.description.affiliation | University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Department of Dentistry and Dental Hygiene, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen | |
dc.description.affiliationUnesp | Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University at São José Dos Campos | |
dc.format.extent | 443-447 | |
dc.identifier | http://www.quintpub.com/journals/jad/abstract.php?article_id=8955#.U0QIX_ldV1Y | |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 9, n. 5, p. 443-447, 2007. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1461-5185 | |
dc.identifier.lattes | 0967916388665754 | |
dc.identifier.lattes | 9234456003563666 | |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-0586-4644 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-36049023447 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69986 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000250298900006 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Adhesive Dentistry | |
dc.relation.ispartofjcr | 1.691 | |
dc.relation.ispartofsjr | 0,839 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Hydrofluoric acid | |
dc.subject | Indirect composite | |
dc.subject | Microtensile test | |
dc.subject | Repair | |
dc.subject | Silica coating | |
dc.subject | hydrofluoric acid | |
dc.subject | resin | |
dc.subject | silane derivative | |
dc.subject | silicon dioxide | |
dc.subject | analysis of variance | |
dc.subject | dental bonding | |
dc.subject | dental care | |
dc.subject | dental etching | |
dc.subject | drug storage | |
dc.subject | methodology | |
dc.subject | randomization | |
dc.subject | surface property | |
dc.subject | tensile strength | |
dc.subject | tooth prosthesis | |
dc.subject | Analysis of Variance | |
dc.subject | Composite Resins | |
dc.subject | Dental Bonding | |
dc.subject | Dental Etching | |
dc.subject | Dental Prosthesis Repair | |
dc.subject | Dental Stress Analysis | |
dc.subject | Drug Storage | |
dc.subject | Hydrofluoric Acid | |
dc.subject | Random Allocation | |
dc.subject | Silanes | |
dc.subject | Silicon Dioxide | |
dc.subject | Surface Properties | |
dc.subject | Tensile Strength | |
dc.title | Bond strength durability of direct and indirect composite systems following surface conditioning for repair | en |
dc.type | Artigo | |
dcterms.license | http://www.quintpub.com/terms.php | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
unesp.author.lattes | 0967916388665754[5] | |
unesp.author.lattes | 9234456003563666 | |
unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0003-0586-4644[5] | |
unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campos | pt |
unesp.department | Materiais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICT | pt |