Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Nanoformulations can significantly affect pesticide degradation and uptake by earthworms and plants

dc.contributor.authorFojtová, Dana
dc.contributor.authorVašíčková, Jana
dc.contributor.authorGrillo, Renato [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBílková, Zuzana
dc.contributor.authorŠimek, Zdeněk
dc.contributor.authorNeuwirthová, Natália
dc.contributor.authorKah, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorHofman, Jakub
dc.contributor.institutionMasaryk University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Auckland
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-06T15:43:49Z
dc.date.available2019-10-06T15:43:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractAn increasing number of nanoformulated pesticides (nanopesticides) have been developed in recent years with the aim to improve pesticide efficiencies and reduce their impact on the environment and human health. However, knowledge about their environmental fate and effects is still very limited. This study compares the soil fate and bioaccumulation of four model nanopesticides (chlorpyrifos and tebuconazole loaded on polymeric and lipid nanocarriers) relative to the conventional formulations and pure active ingredients (all added at 0.5 mg kg -1 ) in microcosms containing earthworms Eisenia fetida and lettuce Lactuca sativa in two soils (LUFA 2.1 and 2.4) over a period of four months. The nanoformulations increased the soil half-life of the pesticides by up to 2 times (e.g. chlorpyrifos with lipid nanocarrier and tebuconazole with polymeric nanocarrier in LUFA 2.1), probably as a direct consequence of the slow release of the pesticide from the nanocarriers. Pesticide bioaccumulation in earthworms was often increased for the nanopesticides probably as a result of their enhanced bioavailability. The nanoformulations were also shown to affect the pesticide bioaccumulation in plants, but trends were inconsistent. Overall, the microcosm results demonstrated that nanoformulations can significantly alter the fate and bioavailability of pesticides. However, generalisations were difficult to make as the impacts depended on the type of nanocarrier, pesticide, soil used and time scale. We believe that our study contributes towards the critical mass of case studies needed to enable a judging of the benefits versus risks of nanopesticides.en
dc.description.affiliationResearch Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment (RECETOX) Faculty of Science Masaryk University, Kamenice 753/5
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Physics and Chemistry School of Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationSchool of Environment University of Auckland, 23 Symonds Street
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Physics and Chemistry School of Engineering São Paulo State University (UNESP)
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EN19057
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Chemistry.
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/EN19057
dc.identifier.issn1448-2517
dc.identifier.lattes2188736885721242
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0284-5782
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065828032
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/187675
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Chemistry
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbioaccumulation
dc.subjectbioavailability
dc.subjectchlorpyrifos
dc.subjectenvironmental fate
dc.subjectlettuce
dc.subjectnanoparticle
dc.subjectnanopesticide
dc.subjectnanostructured lipid carriers
dc.subjectpoly-ϵ-caprolactone
dc.subjectsoil
dc.subjecttebuconazole
dc.titleNanoformulations can significantly affect pesticide degradation and uptake by earthworms and plantsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes2188736885721242[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8705-9229[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2153-7213[8]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0284-5782[3]

Arquivos

Coleções