Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis

dc.contributor.authorPellizzer, Eduardo P. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLemos, Cleidiel A.A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, Daniel A.F.
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Batista, Victor E. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantiago Júnior, Joel F.
dc.contributor.authorVerri, Fellippo R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Sacred Heart – USC
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Alfenas
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Western São Paulo - UNOESTE
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:19:58Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:19:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-01
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to analyze the stress distribution of bone tissue around implants with different implant-abutment interfaces: platform switching (PSW); external hexagon (EH) and Morse taper (MT) with different diameters (regular: Ø 4 mm and wide: Ø 5 mm), bone types (I–IV) and subjected to axial and oblique load conditions using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). Sixteen 3D models of various configurations were simulated using InVesalius, Rhinoceros 3D 4.0, and SolidWorks 2011 software, and processed using Femap 11.2 and NeiNastran 11.0 programs. Axial and oblique forces of 200 N and 100 N, respectively, applied at the occlusal surface of prostheses. Maximum principal stress values were obtained from the peri-implant cortical bone of each model. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Tukey's test for maximum principal stress values. Oblique loading showed higher tensile stress than axial loading (P < 0.001). Wide-diameter implants showed lower stress concentration rather than regular-diameter implants, regardless of both connection and bone type (P < 0.001). Under axial loading, wide-diameter EH implants with regular platforms showed more favorable stress distribution than PSW implants for axial loading (P < 0.001); however, under oblique loading, PSW implants exhibited lower stress concentrations (P < 0.001). Regular-diameter MT implants showed lower stress than EH implants (P < 0.001). Bone type IV showed higher stress in the cortical region than bone types I and II (P < 0.001), but no significant difference when compared with bone type III (P > 0.05). The conclusion drawn from this in silico is that MT implants should be considered for use in situations that preclude the placement of wide-diameter implants, particularly where bone types III and IV are concerned.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Health Sciences University of Sacred Heart – USC
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry Federal University of Alfenas
dc.description.affiliationDepartment Prosthodontics Presidente Prudente Dental School University of Western São Paulo - UNOESTE
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics Araçatuba Dental School UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 09/16164-7
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 303874/2010-4
dc.format.extent645-650
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.012
dc.identifier.citationMaterials Science and Engineering C, v. 90, p. 645-650.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.012
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85046671072.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0928-4931
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85046671072
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/176291
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMaterials Science and Engineering C
dc.relation.ispartofsjr1,110
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBone type
dc.subjectDiameter
dc.subjectFinite element
dc.subjectImplant-abutment interfaces
dc.titleBiomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysisen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85046671072.pdf
Tamanho:
4.84 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: