Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Influence of chlorhexidine, propolis, pulpal pressure simulation, and aging on dentin bond strength

dc.contributor.authorPerote, Letícia Carvalho Coutinho Costa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBarcellos, Daphne Camara
dc.contributor.authorMatuda, Amanda Guedes Nogueira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Raquel Pinto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRosetti, Elizabeth Pimentel
dc.contributor.authorPucci, César Rogério [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Espírito Santo
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T02:49:07Z
dc.date.available2023-03-02T02:49:07Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-01
dc.description.abstractThe present study evaluated the bond strength (μTBS) of dentin treated with chlorhexidine and propolis subjected to simulated pulpal pressure (SPP) and thermocycle aging. One hundred and twenty healthy human molars were sectioned to obtain 2 mm of dentin thickness and were divided into two groups (n = 60): SPP (15 cm H2O) and no SPP (Control group). Dentin surfaces were conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s and were divided according to the dentin treatment (n = 20): Control; Chlorhexidine gluconate (0.2% for 30 s) and Propolis (aqueous propolis extract for 30 s). Half of the specimens were submitted to 15,000 thermocycle aging (5 ± 2°C and 55 ± 2°C). The samples were sectioned into beams and submitted to μTBS. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA (SPP × Dentin treatment × Thermocycle aging) and the Tukey's tests (p <.001). With regard to the SPP, ANOVA revealed that the Control group (32.98 MPa) had significantly higher values of μTBS when compared to the SPP (29.19 MPa). With regard to Thermocycle aging, no aging (34.05 MPa) had significantly higher values of μTBS when compared to the aging (28.12 MPa). With regard to the dentin treatment, Propolis and Chlorhexidine did not statistically influence the results (p >.05). The SPP and thermocycle aging negatively influenced the bond strength between the dentin and resin; the 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate and aqueous propolis extract solutions did not interfere in the bond strength between the resin and dentin. The use of chlorhexidine and propolis as a dental treatment may not influence the dentin bond strength, but SPP and thermocycle aging may damage the longitudinal dentin bond strength. Research Highlights: Chlorhexidine and propolis as a dental treatment may not influence the dentin bond strength. Simulated pulpal pressure and thermocycle aging may damage the longitudinal dentin bond strength.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and technology UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Prosthodontics Federal University of Espírito Santo, ES
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment Restorative Dentistry Institute of Science and technology UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, SP
dc.format.extent3014-3024
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jemt.24150
dc.identifier.citationMicroscopy Research and Technique, v. 85, n. 8, p. 3014-3024, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jemt.24150
dc.identifier.issn1097-0029
dc.identifier.issn1059-910X
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85130461451
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/241868
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofMicroscopy Research and Technique
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbond strength
dc.subjectchlorhexidine
dc.subjectcomposite dental resin
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjectpropolis
dc.subjectsimulated pulpal pressure
dc.titleInfluence of chlorhexidine, propolis, pulpal pressure simulation, and aging on dentin bond strengthen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3588-7620[2]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentOdontologia Restauradora - ICTpt

Arquivos