Logo do repositório

Artificial intelligence as a prediction tool for orthognathic surgery assessment

dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Pedro Henrique José [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLi, Tengfei
dc.contributor.authorLi, Haoyue
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, João Roberto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSantos-Pinto, Ary [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGandini Junior, Luiz Gonzaga [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCevidanes, Lucia Soares
dc.contributor.authorToyama, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorFeltrin, Guilherme Paladini
dc.contributor.authorCampanha, Antonio Augusto
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira Junior, Melchiades Alves
dc.contributor.authorBianchi, Jonas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Michigan
dc.contributor.institutionPrivate practice
dc.contributor.institutionArthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:04:10Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: An ideal orthodontic treatment involves qualitative and quantitative measurements of dental and skeletal components to evaluate patients' discrepancies, such as facial, occlusal, and functional characteristics. Deciding between orthodontics and orthognathic surgery remains challenging, especially in borderline patients. Advances in technology are aiding clinical decisions in orthodontics. The increasing availability of data and the era of big data enable the use of artificial intelligence to guide clinicians' diagnoses. This study aims to test the capacity of different machine learning (ML) models to predict whether orthognathic surgery or orthodontics treatment is required, using soft and hard tissue cephalometric values. Methods: A total of 920 lateral radiographs from patients previously treated with either conventional orthodontics or in combination with orthognathic surgery were used, comprising n = 558 Class II and n = 362 Class III patients, respectively. Thirty-two measures were obtained from each cephalogram at the initial appointment. The subjects were randomly divided into training (n = 552), validation (n = 183), and test (n = 185) datasets, both as an entire sample and divided into Class II and Class III sub-groups. The extracted data were evaluated using 10 machine learning models and by a four-expert panel consisting of orthodontists (n = 2) and surgeons (n = 2). Results: The combined prediction of 10 models showed top-ranked performance in the testing dataset for accuracy, F1-score, and AUC (entire sample: 0.707, 0.706, 0.791; Class II: 0.759, 0.758, 0.824; Class III: 0.822, 0.807, 0.89). Conclusions: The proposed combined 10 ML approach model accurately predicted the need for orthognathic surgery, showing better performance in Class III patients.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Morphology Genetics Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Research Imaging Center University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biostatistics University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry University of Michigan
dc.description.affiliationPrivate practice, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Orthodontics University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Morphology Genetics Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry School of Dentistry São Paulo State University (Unesp), São Paulo
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
dc.description.sponsorshipIdNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research: NIH: R01DE024450
dc.format.extent785-794
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12805
dc.identifier.citationOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research, v. 27, n. 5, p. 785-794, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ocr.12805
dc.identifier.issn1601-6343
dc.identifier.issn1601-6335
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85192384624
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/305776
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectartificial intelligence
dc.subjectorthodontics
dc.subjectorthognathic surgery
dc.titleArtificial intelligence as a prediction tool for orthognathic surgery assessmenten
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0422-5149[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6142-3865[2]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0002-1310-0281[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4935-2256[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3355-0001[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8656-6010[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9786-2253[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3749-0918[12]

Arquivos

Coleções