Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Pelvic differences between brachycephalic and mesaticephalic cats and indirect pelvimetry assessment

dc.contributor.authorMonteiro, C. L. B.
dc.contributor.authorCampos, A. I. M.
dc.contributor.authorMadeira, V. L. H.
dc.contributor.authorSilva, H. V. R.
dc.contributor.authorFreire, L. M. P.
dc.contributor.authorPinto, J. N.
dc.contributor.authorSouza, L. P. de [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, L. D. M. da
dc.contributor.institutionUniv Estadual Ceara
dc.contributor.institutionCtr Diagnost Vet VETER
dc.contributor.institutionSanto Expedito Vet Clin
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-03T13:08:58Z
dc.date.available2014-12-03T13:08:58Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-05
dc.description.abstractPelvic measurements were carried out in cats with various cranial conformations to (1) determine pelvic morphometry, (2) compare any pelvic differences with cranial conformation and gender and (3) determine whether body biometrics can be used to predict pelvic measurements. Thirteen brachycephalic and 14 mesaticephalic female cats and 17 brachycephalic and nine mesaticephalic male cats were used. Body and external pelvic measurements, as well as pelvic radiographs, were performed. Brachycephalic females all had external pelvic and radiographic measurements that were significantly smaller than those of the mesaticephalic females, including smaller pelvic inlet and outlet areas and a smaller pelvic canal shape. Brachycephalic females had wider and flatter heads than do mesaticephalic females. Similarly, brachycephalic males all have radiographic pelvic measurements that are smaller than those of mesaticephalic males. Males had larger pelvis measurements than did their female counterparts for both cranial types, and indirect pelvimetry did not demonstrate good predictive value in determining the internal pelvic measurements. Thus, we conclude that pelvic differences exist between genders and between brachycephalic and mesaticephalic cats. Furthermore, body biometric measurements do not have good predictive value for determining internal pelvic measurements.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Ceara, Lab Carnivore Reprod, Vet Coll, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationCtr Diagnost Vet VETER, Vet Diag Ctr, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationSanto Expedito Vet Clin, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUniv Estadual Paulista UECE, Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Biol, Inst Biosci, BR-60740903 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv Estadual Paulista UECE, Sao Paulo State Univ, Dept Biol, Inst Biosci, BR-60740903 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
dc.format.extent16-+
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.100859
dc.identifier.citationVeterinary Record. London: British Veterinary Assoc, v. 172, n. 1, p. 16-+, 2013.
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/vr.100859
dc.identifier.issn0042-4900
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/111780
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000313410200017
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBritish Veterinary Assoc
dc.relation.ispartofVeterinary Record
dc.relation.ispartofjcr2.050
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,464
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titlePelvic differences between brachycephalic and mesaticephalic cats and indirect pelvimetry assessmenten
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.rightsHolderBritish Veterinary Assoc
dspace.entity.typePublication

Arquivos

Coleções