Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
In vivo osteogenesis and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adherence: Porous-surfaced cylindrical implants vs rough-surfaced threaded implants

dc.contributor.authorFalchete Do Prado, Renata
dc.contributor.authorOliveira De Vasconcellos, Luis Gustavo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorReis De Vasconcellos, Luana Marotta [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAlves Cairo, Carlos Alberto
dc.contributor.authorDe Oliveira Leite, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorDos Santos, Alessandra
dc.contributor.authorCardoso Jorge, Antônio Olavo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDe Lima Romeiro, Rogério
dc.contributor.authorBalducci, Ivan [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Yasmin Rodarte [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionAir and Space Institute
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionFaculty of Pindamonhangaba (FAPI)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T07:14:49Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T07:14:49Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To analyze and compare bone apposition at the interface of commercially available rough-surfaced, threaded implants with porous-surfaced, cylindrical implants after several healing periods in a rabbit model. In addition, the study aimed to elucidate the influence of the implant surface configuration on Streptococcus mutans adherence. Materials and Methods: Using a powder metallurgy technique, a new method was developed to produce titanium implants with a dense core and porous surface to increase bone-implant contact (BIC). Sixty implants were placed in 15 rabbits. In each rabbit, two experimental and two control implants were placed in the right or left tibia. The experimental implants were inserted under pressure into the surgical cavity, while the control implants were self-threaded. The rabbits were euthanized at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postinsertion for undecalcified histologic processing and morphometric evaluation of BIC. Additionally, 16 implants, eight experimental and eight control, were incubated with S mutans to evaluate adherence for each type of implant. Analysis of variance with repeated measures and the Student t test were applied, respectively. Results: Histology showed intimate bone-implant interfaces without soft tissue intervention in both groups. Poroussurfaced cylindrical implants showed a higher BIC (72.41% ± 9.47%) than the rough-surfaced screw implants (61.23% ± 14.12%) (P = .013), while no significant difference in S mutans adherence occurred (P = .351). The implant type effect was more pronounced in the 4-week healing period groups (P = .029). The percentage of BIC was similar throughout the healing periods (P = .333), but gradually increased over time. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the new implant design increased BIC without provoking greater S mutans adherence. © 2013 by Quintessence Publishing Co Inc.en
dc.description.affiliationDivision of Materials Air and Space Institute, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São José dos Campos School of Dentistry Univ Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Biological Science School of Dentistry Faculty of Pindamonhangaba (FAPI), Pindamonhangaba, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São José dos Campos School of Dentistry Univ Estadual Paulista (UNESP), São Paulo
dc.format.extent1630-1638
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2747
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 28, n. 6, p. 1630-1638, 2013.
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.2747
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84899467782
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/227716
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBacterial adherence
dc.subjectBone ingrowth
dc.subjectImplant design
dc.subjectPorous titanium
dc.subjectSurface
dc.titleIn vivo osteogenesis and in vitro Streptococcus mutans adherence: Porous-surfaced cylindrical implants vs rough-surfaced threaded implantsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt
unesp.departmentMateriais Odontológicos e Prótese - ICTpt

Arquivos