Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Cementation of Prosthetic Restorations: From Conventional Cementation to Dental Bonding Concept

dc.contributor.authorHaddad, Marcela Filie [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Eduardo Passos [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAssunção, Wirley Goncalves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:39Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:58Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:39Z
dc.date.issued2011-05-01
dc.description.abstractThe cementation procedure of metal-free fixed partial dentures exhibits special characteristics about the porcelains and cementation agents, which turns the correct association between these materials necessary. Our purpose in this literature review was to point the main groups of cements associated to metal-free restoration and discuss about the advantages, disadvantages, and recommendations of each one. Our search was confined to the electronic databases PubMed and SciELO and to books about this matter. There are essentially 3 types of hard cement: conventional, resin, or a hybrid of the two. The metal-free restorations can be fixed with conventional or resin cements. The right choice of luting material is of vital importance to the longevity of dental restorative materials. Conventional cements are advantageous when good compressive straight, good film thickness, and water dissolution resistance are necessary. However, they need an ideal preparation, and they are not acid dissolution resistant. Conventional cements are indicated to porcelains that cannot be acid etched. Resin cements represent the choice to metal-free restoration cementation because they present better physical properties and aesthetic than conventional agents.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv São Paulo State FOA UNESP, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sch Dent Aracatuba, Dent Program, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.description.affiliationUnespUniv São Paulo State FOA UNESP, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sch Dent Aracatuba, Dent Program, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.format.extent952-958
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820fe205
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 22, n. 3, p. 952-958, 2011.
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820fe205
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.lattes3383392287039820
dc.identifier.lattes4438747643373395
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15246
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290732100042
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation.ispartofjcr0.772
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,448
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restritopt
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCementationen
dc.subjectpartial fixed dentureen
dc.subjectdental bondingen
dc.titleCementation of Prosthetic Restorations: From Conventional Cementation to Dental Bonding Concepten
dc.typeArtigopt
dcterms.licensehttp://edmgr.ovid.com/spine/accounts/copyrightTransfer.pdf
dcterms.rightsHolderLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isDepartmentOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5f53b343-da2a-4737-96ec-6e2389a6d704
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b3335a4-1163-438a-a0e2-921a46e0380d
unesp.author.lattes3383392287039820
unesp.author.lattes4438747643373395
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8903-0737[3]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araçatubapt
unesp.departmentMateriais odontológicos e Prótese - FOApt

Arquivos

Licença do Pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição:
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: