Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Workers’ health policies in Brazil: historical contradictions and possibilities for development

dc.contributor.authorHurtado, Sandra Lorena Beltran
dc.contributor.authorSimonelli, Angela Paula
dc.contributor.authorMininel, Vivian Aline
dc.contributor.authorEsteves, Thaís Vieira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorVilela, Rodolfo Andrade de Gouveia
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Adelaide
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionConservatoire National des Arts et Metiers
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-01T20:23:14Z
dc.date.available2023-03-01T20:23:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe Workers’ Health (WH) approach understands that it is necessary to expand the object of public policies to transform the work processes that determine the health-disease relationship. This broadening brings challenges that drive the development of the formulation and implementation of policies for the surveillance and prevention of diseases. This article aimed to analyze the development of Brazilian policies on WH from the perspective of historical contradictions. To this end, the analytical concept of contradiction from Cultural-Historical Activity Theory was used. This is a scoping review, including 64 theoretical and empirical studies and gray literature published between 1991 and 2019. The results of the analysis showed that: from the change of the object of prevention inserted by the WH approach, five new contradictions emerged that are related to the predominance of instruments of the previous activity model, normative and training instruments, division of labor for assistance and surveillance actions, intra and intersectoral articulations. and social control. These contradictions have driven some changes, but some limitations persist around a challenging object.en
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Saúde Pública Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Terapia Ocupacional Universidade Federal do Paraná, PR
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Enfermagem Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP
dc.description.affiliationFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, SP
dc.description.affiliationConservatoire National des Arts et Metiers
dc.description.affiliationUnespFaculdade de Medicina Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, SP
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipAgence Nationale de la Recherche
dc.description.sponsorshipIdFAPESP: 2020/08413-6
dc.description.sponsorshipIdAgence Nationale de la Recherche: ANR-19-CE26-0021
dc.format.extent3091-3102
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232022278.04942022EN
dc.identifier.citationCiencia e Saude Coletiva, v. 27, n. 8, p. 3091-3102, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1413-81232022278.04942022EN
dc.identifier.issn1678-4561
dc.identifier.issn1413-8123
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135111252
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/240569
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofCiencia e Saude Coletiva
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectWorkers’ health policy
dc.subjectWorkers’ health services
dc.subjectWorkers’ health surveillance
dc.titleWorkers’ health policies in Brazil: historical contradictions and possibilities for developmenten
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4059-2365[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4337-5796[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9985-5575[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1230-6328[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8556-2189[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4847-8762[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt

Arquivos