Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparação entre técnicas coproparasitológicas no diagnóstico de ovos de helmintos e oocistos de protozoários em cães.

dc.contributor.authorTáparo, Cilene V.
dc.contributor.authorPerri, Sílvia H. V.
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Anna Cláudia M.
dc.contributor.authorIshizaki, Miriam N.
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Taiana P. da
dc.contributor.authorAmarante, Alessandro F. T. do
dc.contributor.authorBresciani, Katia Denise Saraiva [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:47Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:47Z
dc.date.issued2006-01-01
dc.description.abstractIn this study we evaluated the frequency of enteroparasites in pet dogs and their association with age, sex and breed, as well as the efficiency of the Willis-Mollay, Faust, Sedimentation and Direct exam methods. By these methods we processed 401 fecal samples. The samples were positive in the following percentages: Ancylostoma spp. (53.1%), Toxocara canis (20.7%), Cystoisospora ohioensis (15.7%), Trichuris vulpis (3.7%), Dipylidium caninum (2.5%) and Taenia spp. (1.0%). Toxocara canis (67.3%) and C. ohioensis (47.3%) showed higher positivity in the puppies. The Willis-Mollay technique was more efficient in the diagnosis of Ancylostoma spp. and T. canis eggs. The Direct method was the least efficient. It was found that the majority of the cases of D. caninum were diagnosed by the Sedimentation method (8=2.0%), while for T. vulpis Willis-Mollay (12=3.0%) and Sedimentation (13=3.2%) were more efficient. In view of these results, we can recommend the association of Willis-Mollay and Sedimentation methods for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal helminths. Due to the elevated occurrence of Ancylostoma spp. and T. canis, which are involved in zoonotic diseases, it becomes necessary to apply more efficient prophylaxis of canine intestinal parasitosis at the City of Araçatuba, state of São Paulo.en
dc.format.extent1-5
dc.identifierhttp://cbpv.com.br/rbpv/documentos/1512006/c1511_5.pdf
dc.identifier.citationRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinária = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Órgão Oficial do Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2006.
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-33750942512.pdf
dc.identifier.issn0103-846X
dc.identifier.lattes5950594366829647
dc.identifier.lattes5950594366829647
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33750942512
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68706
dc.language.isopor
dc.relation.ispartofRevista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária = Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Parasitology
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectanimal parasitosis
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectdog
dc.subjectfeces
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthelminth
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectoocyst
dc.subjectparasite identification
dc.subjectparasitology
dc.subjectprotozoon
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectDogs
dc.subjectFeces
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHelminthiasis, Animal
dc.subjectHelminths
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOocysts
dc.subjectParasite Egg Count
dc.subjectParasitology
dc.subjectProtozoa
dc.subjectProtozoan Infections, Animal
dc.titleComparação entre técnicas coproparasitológicas no diagnóstico de ovos de helmintos e oocistos de protozoários em cães.pt
dc.title.alternativeComparison between coproparasitological techniques for the diagnosis of helminth eggs or protozoa oocysts in dogsen
dc.typeArtigo
dcterms.licensehttp://www.scielo.br/revistas/rbpv/paboutj.htm#03
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.lattes5950594366829647
unesp.author.lattes2677231663329706[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8767-8855[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3995-5501[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentParasitologia - IBBpt

Arquivos

Pacote Original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-33750942512.pdf
Tamanho:
30.53 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format