Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Analysis of Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Process Parameters for Optimizing Adhesion in Aluminum–Composite Hybrid Structures

dc.contributor.authorLucas, Rafael Resende [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Emanuelle Roza Rodrigues [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Luís Felipe Barbosa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Silva, Francisco José Gomes
dc.contributor.authorAbrahão, Ana Beatriz Ramos Moreira
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Miguel de Omena Lucas [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorHein, Luís Rogério de Oliveira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, Edson Cocchieri [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMota, Rogério Pinto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorSales-Contini, Rita de Cássia Mendonça
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionPolytechnic of Porto
dc.contributor.institutionTechnological College of Pindamonhangaba (FATEC)
dc.contributor.institutionTechnological College of São José dos Campos Prof. Jessen Vidal (FATEC)
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:10:18Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-01
dc.description.abstractThe Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO) process was investigated to enhance the adhesion of AA2024-O aluminum alloy with a polyetherimide (PEI) matrix composite, using oxy-fuel welding (OFW). A Central Composite Design (CCD) statistical model was used to optimize three independent parameters in PEO: immersion time (s), duty cycle (%), and electrolyte concentration (Na2B4O7·10H2O), aiming to achieve a maximum value of shear strength of the hybrid joint (in MPa). The hybrid joint without PEO treatment presented a resistance of 2.2 MPa while the best condition presented a resistance of 9.5 MPa, resulting in a value 4× higher than the untreated material, due to the characteristics of the coating, which presented a more hydrophilic surface, allowing better mechanical interlocking with the polymer matrix and resulting in mixed-mode failure (adhesive, cohesive, and light fiber). In addition to improving adhesion, the PEO treatment provided better corrosion resistance to the alloy, forming an inert aluminum oxide (Al2O3) coating, with an improvement of approximately 99.84% compared to the untreated alloy. The statistical design covers about 77.15% of the total variability of the PEO + welding process, with independent factors influencing around 48.4% of the variability.en
dc.description.affiliationSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Engineering and Sciences, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationISEP Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida
dc.description.affiliationElectrochemistry and Corrosion Laboratory Technological College of Pindamonhangaba (FATEC), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationAeronautical Structures Laboratory Technological College of São José dos Campos Prof. Jessen Vidal (FATEC), São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationUnespSão Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Engineering and Sciences, São Paulo
dc.description.sponsorshipCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCAPES: 88881.933644/2024-1
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app14177972
dc.identifier.citationApplied Sciences (Switzerland), v. 14, n. 17, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/app14177972
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85203666174
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/307778
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectaluminum
dc.subjectcharacterizations
dc.subjectcomposite
dc.subjectplasma treatment
dc.subjectwelding
dc.titleAnalysis of Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Process Parameters for Optimizing Adhesion in Aluminum–Composite Hybrid Structuresen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-4490-1903[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8570-4362[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9266-0668[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2160-0609[10]

Arquivos

Coleções