Logo do repositório

Is there an effective way to control pain perception after free gingival graft removal? A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorAmeida, Flavio X.
dc.contributor.authorCotrim, Khalila C.
dc.contributor.authorKalil, Eduardo C.
dc.contributor.authorBechara, Karen
dc.contributor.authorDalla, Renan
dc.contributor.authorRovai, Emanuel S. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorShibli, Jamil A.
dc.contributor.authorCastro Dos Santos, Nidia C.
dc.contributor.institutionGuarulhos University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Taubaté
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionThe Forsyth Institute
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T19:33:56Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe literature describes multiple ways to stimulate wound healing to reduce the patient's perception of pain. This systematic review aimed to evaluate if methods that enhance wound healing can reduce the patient's perception of pain after free gingival graft removal from the palate region compared to natural healing. A systematic review protocol was written following the PRISMA checklist. Electronic searches of five databases were performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed the patient's perception of pain after the removal of a free gingival graft from the palate. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score assessing the patient's perception of pain 7 days after the free gingival graft removal from the palate region. Of the 1,622 potentially relevant articles retrieved from the electronic databases, 16 RCTs were selected for qualitative analysis, and of these, 6 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. RCTs showed a significant VAS reduction associated with the use of methods to enhance wound healing. The pooled estimates revealed a significant overall VAS reduction of 2.20 (95% Cl 2.32, 2.07) 7 days after surgery. The methods that presented the greatest reduction in the perception of pain were platelet-rich fibrin, hyaluronic acid, and autologous fibrin glue. Methods that enhance wound healing, including platelet-rich fibrin, hyaluronic acid, and autologous fibrin glue, can reduce pain perception after free gingival graft removal in the palate region. However, only 1 RCT investigated each approach, which hinders the conclusion regarding the best procedure to reduce the perception of pain. The literature describes multiple ways to stimulate wound healing to reduce the patient's perception of pain. This systematic review aimed to evaluate if methods that enhance wound healing can reduce the patient's perception of pain after free gingival graft removal from the palate region compared to natural healing. A systematic review protocol was written following the PRISMA checklist. Electronic searches of five databases were performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed the patient's perception of pain after the removal of a free gingival graft from the palate. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) score assessing the patient's perception of pain 7 days after the free gingival graft removal from the palate region. Of the 1,622 potentially relevant articles retrieved from the electronic databases, 16 RCTs were selected for qualitative analysis, and of these, 6 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. RCTs showed a significant VAS reduction associated with the use of methods to enhance wound healing. The pooled estimates revealed a significant overall VAS reduction of 2.20 (95% Cl 2.32, 2.07) 7 days after surgery. The methods that presented the greatest reduction in the perception of pain were platelet-rich fibrin, hyaluronic acid, and autologous fibrin glue. Methods that enhance wound healing, including platelet-rich fibrin, hyaluronic acid, and autologous fibrin glue, can reduce pain perception after free gingival graft removal in the palate region. However, only 1 RCT investigated each approach, which hinders the conclusion regarding the best procedure to reduce the perception of pain.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Dental Research Division Guarulhos University, SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dentistry Dental Research Division University of Taubaté, São Paulo
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos
dc.description.affiliationThe Forsyth Institute The Forsyth Institute
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Periodontology Institute of Science and Technology São Paulo State University (UNESP), São José dos Campos
dc.format.extent10-29
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202305503
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian Dental Journal, v. 34, n. 6, p. 10-29, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/0103-6440202305503
dc.identifier.issn1806-4760
dc.identifier.issn0103-6440
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181176998
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/304133
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFree Gingival Graft
dc.subjectPain
dc.subjectPain Control
dc.subjectPalatal Healing
dc.subjectWound Healing
dc.titleIs there an effective way to control pain perception after free gingival graft removal? A systematic review and meta-analysisen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5809-608X[1]
unesp.author.orcid0009-0005-0397-7049[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0824-3918[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4864-3190[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0151-3858[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5044-0368[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1971-0195[7]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2041-9426[8]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campospt

Arquivos