Logo do repositório

Inhalation versus intravenous anaesthesia for adults undergoing on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

dc.contributor.authorEl Dib, Regina [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães Pereira, José E. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Arnav
dc.contributor.authorGomaa, Huda
dc.contributor.authorAyala, Ana Patricia
dc.contributor.authorBotan, Andresa Graciutti [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBraz, Leandro Gobbo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Oliveira, Luciane Dias [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Luciane Cruz
dc.contributor.authorMathew, Preethy J.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionMcMaster University
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Toronto
dc.contributor.institutionTanta Chest Hospital
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Sorocaba
dc.contributor.institutionPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T17:12:15Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T17:12:15Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-01
dc.description.abstractStudy objective To compare the use of inhalation versus intravenous anaesthesia for adults undergoing on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Design A systematic review. Setting A hospital-affiliated university. Measurements The following databases were searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2016, Issue 10), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS (from inception to October 2016). We used the GRADE approach to rate overall certainty of the evidence. Results In total we included 58 studies with a total of 6105 participants. The methodological quality was difficult to assess as it was poorly reported in 35 included studies (three or more domains were rated as unclear risk of bias). Two trials of sevoflurane showed a statistically significant reduction in death within 180 to 365 days of surgery (on-pump) (RR 4.10, 95% CI 1.42 to 11.79; p = 0.009; I2 = not applicable; high quality of evidence). There was also a statistically significant difference favouring sevoflurane compared to propofol on both inotropic (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.90; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and vasoconstrictor support needed (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.22; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%) after coronary artery bypass grafting on-pump. Two trials of sevoflurane (MD − 0.22, 95% CI − 0.41 to − 0.03; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%) and two further trials of desflurane (MD − 0.33, 95% CI − 0.45 to − 0.20; p < 0.00001; I2 = 82%) showed a statistically significant difference on cardiac index during and after coronary artery bypass grafting on-pump, respectively. Conclusions There is high quality evidence that sevoflurane reduces death within 180 to 365 days of surgery and, inotropic and vasoconstrictor support compared to propofol for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. There is also some evidence showing that the cardiac index is minimally influenced by administration of sevoflurane and desflurane compared to propofol.en
dc.description.affiliationInstitute of Science and Technology Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesiology Botucatu Medical School Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationMcMaster Institute of Urology McMaster University
dc.description.affiliationFaculty of Medicine University of Toronto
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pharmacy Tanta Chest Hospital
dc.description.affiliationGerstein Science Information Centre University of Toronto
dc.description.affiliationPharmaceutical Science Graduate Course University of Sorocaba
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
dc.description.affiliationUnespInstitute of Science and Technology Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Anaesthesiology Botucatu Medical School Unesp - Univ Estadual Paulista
dc.format.extent127-138
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.05.010
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, v. 40, p. 127-138.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.05.010
dc.identifier.file2-s2.0-85019882604.pdf
dc.identifier.issn1873-4529
dc.identifier.issn0952-8180
dc.identifier.lattes7199562550978496
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85019882604
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/174651
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Anesthesia
dc.relation.ispartofsjr0,484
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso abertopt
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCoronary artery bypass grafting
dc.subjectGrade
dc.subjectInhalation anaesthesia
dc.subjectIntravenous anaesthesia
dc.subjectOff-pump
dc.subjectOn-pump
dc.subjectRandomized controlled trials
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.titleInhalation versus intravenous anaesthesia for adults undergoing on-pump or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsen
dc.typeResenhapt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationa3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya3cdb24b-db92-40d9-b3af-2eacecf9f2ba
unesp.author.lattes7199562550978496
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3613-2270[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Medicina, Botucatupt
unesp.departmentAnestesiologia - FMBpt

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
2-s2.0-85019882604.pdf
Tamanho:
1.38 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descrição: