Classification Performance of Machine Learning Methods for Identifying Resistance, Resilience, and Susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus Infections in Sheep
| dc.contributor.author | Freitas, Luara A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Savegnago, Rodrigo P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alves, Anderson A. C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Costa, Ricardo L. D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Munari, Danisio P. [UNESP] | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stafuzza, Nedenia B. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rosa, Guilherme J. M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Paz, Claudia C. P. | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
| dc.contributor.institution | University of Wisconsin | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Michigan State University | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Animal Science Institute | |
| dc.contributor.institution | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-29T12:51:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-29T12:51:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-02-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigated the feasibility of using easy-to-measure phenotypic traits to predict sheep resistant, resilient, and susceptible to gastrointestinal nematodes, compared the classification performance of multinomial logistic regression (MLR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) methods, and evaluated the applicability of the best classification model on each farm. The database comprised 3654 records of 1250 Santa Inês sheep from 6 farms. The animals were classified into resistant (2605 records), resilient (939 records), and susceptible (110 records) according to fecal egg count and packed cell volume. A random oversampling method was performed to balance the dataset. The classification methods were fitted using the information of age class, the month of record, farm, sex, Famacha© degree, body weight, and body condition score as predictors, and the resistance, resilience, and susceptibility to gastrointestinal nematodes as the target classes to be predicted considering data from all farms randomly. An additional leave-one-farm-out cross-validation technique was used to assess prediction quality across farms. The MLR and LDA models presented good performances in predicting susceptible and resistant animals. The results suggest that the use of readily available records and easily measurable traits may provide useful information for supporting management decisions at the farm level. | en |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Genetics University of Sao Paulo, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences University of Wisconsin | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Department of Animal Science Michigan State University | |
| dc.description.affiliation | São Paulo Agency of Agribusiness and Technology Animal Science Institute, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliation | Sustainable Livestock Research Center Animal Science Institute, SP | |
| dc.description.affiliationUnesp | School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences São Paulo State University, SP | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) | |
| dc.identifier | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13030374 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Animals, v. 13, n. 3, 2023. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ani13030374 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2076-2615 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85147833385 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/246808 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Animals | |
| dc.source | Scopus | |
| dc.subject | multinomial logistic regression | |
| dc.subject | Ovis aries | |
| dc.subject | precision | |
| dc.subject | sensitivity | |
| dc.title | Classification Performance of Machine Learning Methods for Identifying Resistance, Resilience, and Susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus Infections in Sheep | en |
| dc.type | Artigo | pt |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | 3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 3d807254-e442-45e5-a80b-0f6bf3a26e48 | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-7454-9325[1] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-8888-6915[4] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-6915-038X[5] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-6432-2330[6] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0001-9172-6461[7] | |
| unesp.author.orcid | 0000-0002-7267-4552[8] | |
| unesp.campus | Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Jaboticabal | pt |

