Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Species-poor and low-lying sites are more ecologically unique in a hyperdiverse Amazon region: Evidence from multiple taxonomic groups

dc.contributor.authorLandeiro, Victor Lemes
dc.contributor.authorFranz, Bárbarah
dc.contributor.authorHeino, Jani
dc.contributor.authorSiqueira, Tadeu [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBini, Luis Mauricio
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso
dc.contributor.institutionBiodiversity
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T16:52:08Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T16:52:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-01
dc.description.abstractAim: We analysed beta-diversity patterns of various biological groups simultaneously, from the perspective of site ecological uniqueness. We also investigated whether ecological uniqueness variation could be explained by variations in environmental conditions and spatial variables. Data: Central Amazonia. Methods: We estimated the total beta diversity and ecological uniqueness for 14 biological groups, including plants and animals, sampled at the same sites on a mesoscale in central Amazonia, Brazil. The uniqueness values for all biological groups were combined in a single matrix (multi-taxa matrix of site uniqueness), which was then used as a response variable matrix in a partial redundancy analysis. We also investigated differences in the uniqueness patterns between plant and animal groups. Results: In general, plants showed higher total beta diversity than animals. For plants, uniqueness was explained mainly by environmental conditions, while for animals, uniqueness was also related to spatial variables. Although variation in uniqueness was mainly related to soil clay content, it is difficult to determine a single major environmental variable underlying the variation in uniqueness because the topographical gradient influences many of them, including soil clay content. Main Conclusion: The uniqueness values were higher in low-lying areas, indicating that near-stream sites were more ecologically unique. Despite the lower number of species in the lowlands, their unique biota contributed strongly to the maintenance of the total beta diversity of the area. This finding should be considered in conservation plans that aim to represent and preserve the regional biota. Our approach proved to be useful to analyse and compare the ecological uniqueness of multiple taxa.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Botânica e Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso
dc.description.affiliationFinnish Environment Institute Natural Environment Centre Biodiversity
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.affiliationDepartamento de Ecologia Universidade Federal de Goiás
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartamento de Ecologia Instituto de Biociências Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.description.sponsorshipConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
dc.description.sponsorshipIdCNPq: 471526/2013-4
dc.format.extent966-977
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12734
dc.identifier.citationDiversity and Distributions, v. 24, n. 7, p. 966-977, 2018.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ddi.12734
dc.identifier.issn1472-4642
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85042604743
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/170716
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDiversity and Distributions
dc.relation.ispartofsjr2,521
dc.relation.ispartofsjr2,521
dc.rights.accessRightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectanimal data
dc.subjectcommunity data
dc.subjectenvironmental control
dc.subjectLCBD
dc.subjectplant data
dc.subjectredundancy analysis
dc.subjectspatial factors
dc.subjectuniqueness
dc.titleSpecies-poor and low-lying sites are more ecologically unique in a hyperdiverse Amazon region: Evidence from multiple taxonomic groupsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9341-6050[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1235-6613[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5069-2904[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3398-9399[5]

Arquivos

Coleções