Logo do repositório

Modeling Gastrointestinal Tract Wet Pool Size in Small Ruminants

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro, Paola R. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorGindri, Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorMacedo Junior, Gilberto L.
dc.contributor.authorHerbster, Caio J. L.
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Elzania S.
dc.contributor.authorBiagioli, Bruno [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, Izabelle A. M. A. [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversité Paris-Saclay
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.contributor.institutionFederal University of Ceará
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Idaho
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:16:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-01
dc.description.abstractThe gastrointestinal tract (GIT) wet pool size (GITwps) refers to the total amount of wet contents in GIT, which in small ruminants can reach up to 19% of their body weight (BW). This study aimed to develop models to comprehensively predict GITwps in small ruminants using a meta-regression approach. A dataset was created based on 21 studies, comprising 750 individual records of sheep and goats. Various predictor variables, including BW, sex, breed, species, intake level, physiological states, stages and types of pregnancy, dry matter intake, and neutral detergent fiber intake (NDFI), were initially analyzed through simple linear regression. Subsequently, the variables were fitted using natural logarithm transformations, considering the random effect of the study and residual error, employing a supervised forward selection procedure. Overall, no significant relationship between GITwps and BW (p = 0.326) was observed for animals fed a milk-based diet. However, a strong negative linear relationship (p < 0.001) was found for animals on a solid diet, with the level of restriction influencing GITwps only at the intercept. Furthermore, the prediction of GITwps was independent of sex and influenced by species in cases where individuals were fed ad libitum. Pregnant females showed a noticeable reduction in GITwps, which was more pronounced in cases of multiple pregnancies, regardless of species (p < 0.01). The composition of the diet was found to be the primary factor affecting the modulation of GITwps, with NDFI able to override the species effect (p < 0.0001). Overall, this study sheds light on the factors influencing GITwps in small ruminants, providing valuable insights into their digestive processes and nutritional requirements.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Science São Paulo State University, SP
dc.description.affiliationUMR Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants AgroParisTech INRAE Université Paris-Saclay
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Science Federal University of Uberlândia, MG
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Science Federal University of Ceará, CE
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Animal Veterinary and Food Sciences University of Idaho
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Animal Science São Paulo State University, SP
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani13182909
dc.identifier.citationAnimals, v. 13, n. 18, 2023.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ani13182909
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85171991312
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/309811
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnimals
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectdiet
dc.subjectgoats
dc.subjectgut fill
dc.subjectintake
dc.subjectintrinsic factors
dc.subjectmeta-regression
dc.subjectneutral detergent fiber
dc.subjectprediction models
dc.subjectsheep
dc.subjectsmall ruminants
dc.titleModeling Gastrointestinal Tract Wet Pool Size in Small Ruminantsen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-8448-107X[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-3569-8827[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5781-7917[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1325-546X[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2003-5203[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7458-5975[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7432-867X[7]

Arquivos

Coleções