Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
How image-processing parameters can influence the assessment of dental materials using micro-CT

dc.contributor.authorTorres, Fernanda Ferrari Esteves [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Reinhilde
dc.contributor.authorEzEldeen, Mostafa
dc.contributor.authorde Faria-Vasconcelos, Karla
dc.contributor.authorGuerreiro-Tanomaru, Juliane Maria [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Bernardo Camargo
dc.contributor.authorTanomaru-Filho, Mário [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity Hospitals Leuven
dc.contributor.institutionKarolinska Institute
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-12T01:30:00Z
dc.date.available2020-12-12T01:30:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of voxel size and different post-processing algorithms on the analysis of dental materials using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Materials and Methods: Root-end cavities were prepared in extracted maxillary premolars, filled with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM), and scanned using micro-CT. The volume and porosity of materials were evaluated and compared using voxel sizes of 5, 10, and 20 μm, as well as different software tools (post-processing algorithms). The CTAn or MeVisLab/Materialise 3-matic software package was used to perform volume and morphological analyses, and the CTAn or MeVisLab/Amira software was used to evaluate porosity. Data were analyzed using 1-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (P<0.05). Results: Using MeVisLab/Materialise 3-matic, a consistent tendency was observed for volume to increase at larger voxel sizes. CTAn showed higher volumes for MTA and IRM at 20 μm. Using CTAn, porosity values decreased as voxel size increased, with statistically significant differences for all materials. MeVisLab/Amira showed a difference for MTA and IRM at 5 μm, and for Biodentine at 20 μm. Significant differences in volume and porosity were observed in all software packages for Biodentine across all voxel sizes. Conclusion: Some differences in volume and porosity were found according to voxel size, image-processing software, and the radiopacity of the material. Consistent protocols are needed for research evaluating dental materials.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.description.affiliationOMFS IMPATH Research Group Department of Imaging and Pathology KU Leuven and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University Hospitals Leuven
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Medicine Karolinska Institute
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Nuclear Energy Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Restorative Dentistry São Paulo State University (UNESP) School of Dentistry
dc.format.extent161-168
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.161
dc.identifier.citationImaging Science in Dentistry, v. 50, n. 2, p. 161-168, 2020.
dc.identifier.doi10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.161
dc.identifier.issn2233-7830
dc.identifier.issn2233-7822
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087510863
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/199072
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofImaging Science in Dentistry
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectComputer-assisted
dc.subjectDental materials
dc.subjectImage processing
dc.subjectImaging
dc.subjectThree-dimensional
dc.subjectX-ray microtomography
dc.titleHow image-processing parameters can influence the assessment of dental materials using micro-CTen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0631-3249[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3461-0363[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9992-1138[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-0351-3683[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0446-2037[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-0096-9092[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-2574-4706[7]

Arquivos

Coleções