Logo do repositório

Enhancing mouthguard longevity: Impact of surface treatment against aging from brushing and disinfectant exposure

dc.contributor.authorHaddad e Borro, Larissa [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorde Queiroz, Talita Suelen [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorda Cruz, Beatriz Serralheiro [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorDemachkia, Amir Mohidin [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorBorges, Alexandre Luiz Souto [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorTribst, João Paulo Mendes
dc.contributor.authorPaes Junior, Tarcisio Jose de Arruda [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T20:06:04Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-01
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aims: The study aimed to assess the surface characteristics of sports mouthguards under mechanical stresses during cleaning, either by brushing or immersion in disinfectant solutions. Material and Methods: Ethylene-vinyl acetate samples, 4 mm thick, were randomly assigned to cleaning methods: control (C—no cleaning), brushing with water (B.W), brushing with neutral liquid soap (B.S), brushing with toothpaste (B.T), immersion in distilled water for 10 min (I.W), immersion in 2.25% sodium hypochlorite solution for 10 min (I.SH), and immersion in sodium bicarbonate solution for 5 min (I.SB). All cleaning methods were applied for 28 days. Surface roughness average (Ra) and wettability were measured at baseline for the control group (n = 9), and after cleaning for all the other groups. Results: One-way ANOVA with Tukey tests (5% significance) indicated significant differences among groups (p <.05). The I.SB group had higher surface roughness than B.S and B.T (p <.05). B.W showed the lowest wettability, significantly lower than B.T, I.W, and I.SB (p <.05). I.SB exhibited the highest wettability, significantly different from sodium hypochlorite, neutral liquid soap, brushing with water, and control groups (p <.05). The sodium bicarbonate immersion group (I.SB) demonstrated greater statistical variation, displaying higher susceptibility to aging compared to brushing with neutral liquid soap. Conclusion: Cleaning mouthguards with a toothbrush, water, and neutral liquid soap emerged as the most promising method, causing minimal surface changes in the material.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Reconstructive Oral Care Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA) University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics São Paulo State University (UNESP), SP
dc.format.extent453-459
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/edt.12941
dc.identifier.citationDental Traumatology, v. 40, n. 4, p. 453-459, 2024.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/edt.12941
dc.identifier.issn1600-9657
dc.identifier.issn1600-4469
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85187190422
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11449/306389
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofDental Traumatology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectaging
dc.subjectcleaning
dc.subjectethylene vinyl acetate
dc.subjectmouthguards
dc.titleEnhancing mouthguard longevity: Impact of surface treatment against aging from brushing and disinfectant exposureen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-5523-3280[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-3026-7705[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-6315-1127[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5707-7565[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5412-3546[6]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8446-0474[7]

Arquivos

Coleções