Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Comparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical study

dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Vithor Xavier Resende de
dc.contributor.authorPinotti, Felipe Eduardo [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chiérici [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorMarcantonio, Elcio [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:40:44Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:40:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated osseointegration in areas grafted with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and biphasic ceramic based on hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP) in rat tibias. Noncritical bone defects were made in the tibias of 28 rats that were randomly assigned to 2 groups: DBB: DBB-filled defects and HA/TCP: HA/TCP-filled defects. Bone defects were made in the tibias bilaterally and filled with biomaterials. After 60 days, the implants were inserted, and the animals were euthanized 15 and 45 days after the implants were installed. Osseointegration was evaluated by biomechanical, microtomographic and histometric analysis. Implants installed in the defects filled with DBB presented higher removal torque forces (2.33 ± 0.51 Ncm vs. 1.50 ± 0.54 Ncm) and mineralized tissue volume around implants at 15 days (34.96 ± 3.68 % vs. 25.61 ± 2.95 %) and greater bone-implant contact (20.87 ± 8.28 % vs. 11.52 ± 7.42 %) and bone area within implant threads (26.83 ± 12.35 % vs. 11.98 ± 7.56 %) at 45 days compared to the measurements of implants in areas grafted with HA/TCP. Implants installed in defects in areas grafted with DBB had a better osseointegration pattern than implants placed in defects in areas grafted with HA/TCP.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Periodontology/ Implantodontology School of Dentistry Universidade Federal de Uberlândia(FOUFU)
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry at Araraquara(FOAr-Unesp)
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Diagnosis and Surgery School of Dentistry at Araraquara(FOAr-Unesp)
dc.format.extent105-111
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204378
dc.identifier.citationBrazilian dental journal, v. 33, n. 1, p. 105-111, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/0103-6440202204378
dc.identifier.issn1806-4760
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85126078722
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/230549
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian dental journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleComparison of osseointegration in areas grafted with different osteoconductive biomaterials. Preclinical studyen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublicationca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryca4c0298-cd82-48ee-a9c8-c97704bac2b0
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1494-5016[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-1555-6242[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-5052-7439[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1294-2305[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-8778-0115[5]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia, Araraquarapt
unesp.departmentDiagnóstico e Cirurgia - FOARpt

Arquivos