Logotipo do repositório
 

Publicação:
Assessing ZWD models in delay and height domains using data from stations in different climate regions

dc.contributor.authorde Lima, Thainara Munhoz Alexandre
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorAlves, Daniele Barroca Marra [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNikolaidou, Thalia
dc.contributor.authorGouveia, Tayná Aparecida Ferreira [UNESP]
dc.contributor.institutionNational Institute of Space Research (INPE)
dc.contributor.institutionUniversity of New Brunswick
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T08:38:31Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T08:38:31Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-01
dc.description.abstractGlobal Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) has revolutionized activities involving geodetic positioning. To achieve a desired accuracy, it is essential to model the atmosphere in an appropriate way. With respect to the neutral atmosphere, the signal sent by the satellite suffers a delay when crossing this layer during its travel to the receiver on the surface, the so-called neutral atmospheric delay. Although empirical models exist, they may not be suitable to represent microclimatic variations in different regions of the globe due to peculiarities that exist in diverse areas. To minimize this limitation, correction models based on numerical weather prediction (NWP) emerge. They allow the assessment of the delay from local atmospheric parameters and the evaluation of atmospheric particularities of each region. In addition, another way to obtain neutral atmosphere delay is by making use of data from radiosondes, which measure atmospheric data at various altitude levels. The main objective of this article is to investigate the performance of different models using GNSS data collected in countries with different climatic conditions. Assessment is performed on the positioning domain using the precise point positioning (PPP) technique. The results show that the proximity between the NWP-based models and radiosondes was approximately 3 cm, and that between empirical models was 5 cm, with variations that depended on the model and the region. Regarding the impact on the height component, the difference between the accuracy of the empirical and NWP models was approximately 16 cm.en
dc.description.affiliationInstrumentation Lab for Aquatic Systems (LabISA) National Institute of Space Research (INPE), SP
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Cartography São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, SP
dc.description.affiliationUnespDepartment of Cartography São Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, SP
dc.format.extent93-103
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00414-y
dc.identifier.citationApplied Geomatics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 93-103, 2022.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12518-021-00414-y
dc.identifier.issn1866-928X
dc.identifier.issn1866-9298
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85122676842
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/230201
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Geomatics
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectNeutral atmospheric zenith delay
dc.subjectNWP
dc.subjectPPP
dc.subjectRadiosonde
dc.titleAssessing ZWD models in delay and height domains using data from stations in different climate regionsen
dc.typeArtigo
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-6492-0330[1]
unesp.departmentCartografia - FCTpt

Arquivos