Logo do repositório

A modeling framework to quantify the effects of compaction on soil water retention and infiltration

dc.contributor.authorNgo-Cong, Duc
dc.contributor.authorAntille, Diogenes L.
dc.contributor.authorTh. van Genuchten, Martinus [UNESP]
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Hung Q.
dc.contributor.authorTekeste, Mehari Z.
dc.contributor.authorBaillie, Craig P.
dc.contributor.authorGodwin, Richard J.
dc.contributor.institutionCentre for Agricultural Engineering
dc.contributor.institutionBlack Mountain Science and Innovation Precinct
dc.contributor.institutionUtrecht Univ.
dc.contributor.institutionUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.institutionIowa State Univ.
dc.contributor.institutionHarper Adams Univ.
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-28T19:46:33Z
dc.date.available2022-04-28T19:46:33Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractThe water retention curve (WRC) of arable soils from the southeastern United States at different levels of compaction (no compaction, and 10 and 20% increases in soil bulk density) was estimated using the van Genuchten–Mualem (VG) model. The VG water retention parameters of the noncompacted soils were obtained first by fitting measured soil hydraulic data. To construct the WRC of the compacted soils, gravimetric values of the permanent wilting point (θgw, 1,500 kPa) and the residual (θgr) water content were assumed to remain unchanged with compaction. The VG parameter α and exponent η after compaction were estimated using two approaches. In Approach 1, α and η were estimated from saturation, the permanent wilting point, and the residual water content. In Approach 2, the value of η was assumed to remain unchanged with compaction, which allowed α to be estimated immediately from the VG equation. Approach 2 was found to give slightly better agreement with measured data than Approach 1. The effect of compaction on the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) was predicted using semitheoretical approaches and the VG-WRC function. HYDRUS-1D was further used to simulate vertical infiltration into a single-layered soil profile to determine the impact of compaction on the infiltration characteristics of the soils used in our analyses. Results showed that a 10–20% increase in soil bulk density, due to compaction, reduced cumulative infiltration (Ic) at time T = Tfinal (steady-state) by 55–82%, and the available water storage capacity by 3–49%, depending upon soil type.en
dc.description.affiliationUniv. of Southern Queensland Centre for Agricultural Engineering
dc.description.affiliationCSIRO Agriculture and Food Black Mountain Science and Innovation Precinct
dc.description.affiliationDep. of Earth Sciences Utrecht Univ.
dc.description.affiliationCenter for Environmental Studies São Paulo State Univ.
dc.description.affiliationDep. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State Univ.
dc.description.affiliationEngineering Dep. Harper Adams Univ.
dc.description.affiliationUnespCenter for Environmental Studies São Paulo State Univ.
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20328
dc.identifier.citationSoil Science Society of America Journal.
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/saj2.20328
dc.identifier.issn1435-0661
dc.identifier.issn0361-5995
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118205256
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/222753
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSoil Science Society of America Journal
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleA modeling framework to quantify the effects of compaction on soil water retention and infiltrationen
dc.typeArtigopt
dspace.entity.typePublication
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-9910-5691[1]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-4924-9689[2]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-1654-8858[3]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0002-7890-1701[4]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0003-2463-1061[5]
unesp.author.orcid0000-0001-9012-1743[6]
unesp.campusUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Centro de Estudos Ambientais, Rio Claropt

Arquivos